"The most valuable features are that it's robust and reliable and that the CP memory can be updated in runtime."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"The initial setup could be simpler."
"It could be more stable and more secure."
More Veritas InfoScale Availability Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM PowerHA System Mirror is ranked 2nd in High Availability Clustering with 2 reviews while Veritas InfoScale Availability is ranked 3rd in High Availability Clustering. IBM PowerHA System Mirror is rated 9.0, while Veritas InfoScale Availability is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM PowerHA System Mirror writes "During failovers or site switches it integrates the storage and ensures the transition of your applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas InfoScale Availability writes "It provides a stable SAP environment, but deployment does require someone with experience". IBM PowerHA System Mirror is most compared with Windows Server Failover Clustering and HPE Serviceguard, whereas Veritas InfoScale Availability is most compared with Windows Server Failover Clustering, HPE Serviceguard and DRBD.
See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.
We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.