IBM PSS vs Kroll Ontrack Verve [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM PSS and Kroll Ontrack Verve [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
24th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
89
Comparisons
68
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In eDiscovery
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
PSS
Verve
Learn More
Overview
IBM Atlas eDiscovery Process Management empowers attorneys, paralegals and discovery directors to manage rigorous, highly defensible legal workflows.
Verve helps engage Customers, Employees and Partners to enable interactions that drive innovation
Sample Customers
LDB Group, RightShip, Tennessee Highway Patrol, Capgemini Consulting, TEAC Corporation, Ironside, nViso SA
Micron, HP
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM PSS is ranked 24th in eDiscovery while Kroll Ontrack Verve [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery. IBM PSS is rated 0.0, while Kroll Ontrack Verve [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM PSS is most compared with , whereas Kroll Ontrack Verve [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.