Compare IBM PurePower System vs. IBM VersaStack
 Find out what your peers are saying about FlexPod, Dell EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: December 2020. 456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012. |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Converged Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs. 456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: We never have any issues or glitches. Top Answer: I would like to see an improvement in the management of the solution. The management is really difficult when it comes to systems with traditional services. It is much faster if we manage everything… more » Top Answer: We use this program for our Oracle platforms because all our Oracle databases are in IX. Our big application is the Oracle E-Business Suite, which we use for our financial situation and everything… more » | Ask a question Earn 20 points |
Ranking  | |
Views 29 Comparisons 6 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 584 Rating 8.0 | Views 653 Comparisons 399 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 50% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time. Compared 16% of the time. Compared 15% of the time. | |
Learn | |
| IBM | IBM |
Overview | |
| IBM PurePower System offering combines storage devices, networking devices, virtualization capabilities, and management functions into a single infrastructure. The IBM PurePower System offering is provided in several single rack and multiple-rack configurations and vary over time as technology and offerings are increased. | VersaStack is a converged infrastructure solution of network, compute and storage designed for quick deployment and rapid time to value. The solution includes Cisco UCS integrated infrastructure together with IBM software- defined storage solutions to deliver extraordinary levels of agility and efficiency. VersaStack is backed by Cisco Validated Designs and IBM Redbooks application guides for faster infrastructure delivery as well as workload/ application deployment. Designed for dynamic organizations that want to accelerate business growth while reducing costs, VersaStack incorporates IBM all-flash as well as hybrid storage technologies into the “single pane of glass” management environment provided by Cisco UCS Director. The solution offers quick deployment and execution of business applications—with the versatility to adapt as business priorities change. Providing an IT infrastructure that is easy, efficient and versatile, VersaStack helps accelerate data center infrastructure deployment and helps efficiently manage information and resources amid business change. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM PurePower System | Learn more about IBM VersaStack |
Sample Customers | |
Information Not Available | Newhall Hospital, Medicat, JJ Haines, Sigmax |
Find out what your peers are saying about FlexPod, Dell EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: December 2020.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM PurePower System is ranked 9th in Converged Infrastructure with 1 review while IBM VersaStack is ranked 11th in Converged Infrastructure. IBM PurePower System is rated 8.0, while IBM VersaStack is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM PurePower System writes "Easy to work on and has never had any glitches or issues ". On the other hand, IBM PurePower System is most compared with , whereas IBM VersaStack is most compared with FlexPod, Dell EMC VxBlock System, Dell PowerEdge VRTX and Dell EMC Vscale Architecture.
See our list of best Converged Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Converged Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.