IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL] Comparison

IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics

Microsoft ATA [EOL]

IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics

Read 8 IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics reviews.

282 views|214 comparisons

Microsoft ATA [EOL]

Read 3 Microsoft ATA [EOL] reviews.

views| comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Use IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics? Share your opinion.

Anonymous User

Security Officer

Gives us better, real-time awareness of possible employee-fraud situations

It's given us a better, more real-time ability to be aware of employee situations that could be fraudulent. It has also measurably decreased our... Read more »

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: January 2021.

Download now

457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Most of the features are good. It is an excellent solution.""In terms of the most valuable features, the log collections and log processing mechanisms are good. They have good dashboards.""QRadar shows very effective correlations. If you combine all the logins plus user behavior and the current intelligence, it gives a very good correlation for business. I think it reduces the false positives in user activity monitoring because there is a lot of social information to correlate with other data.""It has a powerful GUI where you can put together your use cases, and don't have to write your own scripts.""I really like the feature we have with the logs, that if there are any credit card numbers being used, like a PII, you can just use rejects and you can mask it. This is a really good feature in QRadar.""The feature that I find the most useful is that IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is free of charge. It's a fully free product that can be installed on top of IBM QRadar SIEM.""It provides many options for searching. I can see devices from different vendors, like Cisco, in one interface, which is good for me.""Integration is very easy and the reporting is good." More IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Pros »	"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity.""The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions.""The stability of the solution is very good." More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pros »
Cons
"IMB should reduce the pricing, or reduce some of the features for a more economical solution for the customer.""They have to build more quantitative monitoring, profiling, and make it more predictive.""From a functionality point of view there are issues sometimes.""While the interface is easy to use, it could be a little more responsive.""There should be an extension where we can get the reports. This could be an extension to the dashboard with the Guardian or another product with limited technology, for example IPS. Now, we only have IBM. Basically, it needs more and more integration models.""The user interface and configurability of IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics can be improved. It has a lot of pre-configured settings and not many things can be changed. It also needs more integrations. Currently, User Behavior Analytics is integrated only with IBM QRadar. It could have deeper integrations. It can also have more complicated scoring models. Currently, it has a very simple linear scoring model for users.""We sometimes get an error about the hard drive. Approximately once in two months, we can't find the logs, and they go missing, which is a terrible issue. We are getting support for this issue from our support company.""The dashboard is pathetic and it takes a long time to perform a search." More IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Cons »	"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate.""It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict.""There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area." More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price of this solution is a little bit expensive, so if it were cheaper then it would help.""It's free of charge.""The price of this product is high." More IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice »	"I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month." More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics? Top Answer: In terms of the most valuable features, the log collections and log processing mechanisms are good. They have good dashboards. Read all 2 answers What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics? Top Answer: There are more costs in addition to standard licensing; support, building. Read all 2 answers What needs improvement with IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics? Top Answer: They have to build more quantitative monitoring, profiling, and make it more predictive. Read all 2 answers	What do you like most about Microsoft ATA? Top Answer: The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions. Read all 2 answers What needs improvement with Microsoft ATA? Top Answer: The software is not as advanced as many competitors. It doesn't offer the level of granularity that other software might. It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations… more » Read all 2 answers What is your primary use case for Microsoft ATA? Top Answer: The solution is primarily used by my clients in order to combine security software. Read all 2 answers
Ranking
13th out of 38 in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA Views 282 Comparisons 214 Reviews 7 Average Words per Review 417 Rating 6.7	Unranked In User Behavior Analytics - UEBA
Popular Comparisons
Securonix UEBA vs. IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Compared 44% of the time. Cynet vs. IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Compared 24% of the time. LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA vs. IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Compared 11% of the time. Citrix Analytics vs. IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Compared 11% of the time. Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs. IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Compared 10% of the time. See more IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics competitors » + Add more products to compare	Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL] Compared 27% of the time. Varonis Datalert vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL] Compared 22% of the time. Securonix UEBA vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL] Compared 12% of the time. Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL] Compared 9% of the time. Rapid7 InsightVM vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL] Compared 4% of the time. See more Microsoft ATA [EOL] competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
IBM QRadar UBA, QRadar UBA, QRadar User Behavior Analytics	Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics
Learn
IBM	Microsoft
Overview
The User Behavior Analytics for QRadar (UBA) app is a tool for detecting insider threats in your organization. It is built on top of the app framework to use existing data in your QRadar to generate new insights around users and risk. UBA adds two major functions to QRadar: risk profiling and unified user identities. Risk profiling is done by assigning risk to different security use cases. Examples might include simple rules and checks such as bad websites, or more advanced stateful analytics that use machine learning. Risk is assigned to each one depending on the severity and reliability of the incident detected. UBA uses existing event and flow data in your QRadar system to generate these insights and profile risks of users.	Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.
Offer
Learn more about IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Learn More	Learn more about Microsoft ATA [EOL] Learn More
Sample Customers
Information Not Available	Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS Comms Service Provider39% Insurance Company17% Computer Software Company17% Energy/Utilities Company6%	VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company27% Comms Service Provider17% Government11% Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS Midsize Enterprise29% Large Enterprise71%	No Data Available

Compare IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL]