Compare IBM QRadar vs. LogPoint

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Devo Logo
Read 4 Devo reviews.
4,868 views|2,808 comparisons
IBM QRadar Logo
39,376 views|26,617 comparisons
LogPoint Logo
3,112 views|1,932 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM QRadar vs. LogPoint and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events.""Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive.""The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean.""One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful.""Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."

More Devo Pros »

"Providing real-time visibility for threat detection and prioritization - QRadar SIEM provides contextual and actionable surveillance across the entire IT infrastructure.""The ability to transition from microscopic to macroscopic view, instantly, is very good.""It is very stable. We have not faced interruptions in the past four and a half years.""It has improved comprehensive visibility for what is going on in the perimeters, and on the inside, as well.""This solution has allowed us to correlate logs from multiple sources.""We get events and make the correlation, or rules. In IBM, we can implement our customer's rules. We can have very clear status threats and severity of antigens.""Provided that the report is prebuilt and I can find what I am looking for, the reporting is the most valuable feature in this solution.""This solution provides me with various alarms, and I have found security issues with some of my other products."

More IBM QRadar Pros »

"Log collection, dashboards and reporting are good.""Technical support is responsive and very friendly.""The flexibility of the search feature and the solution's analytics features are the most valuable parts of the solution.""The solution offers excellent reporting features. Our customers have been satisfied that they have been able to meet their compliance needs by giving them a standard report."

More LogPoint Pros »

Cons
"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. The breadth of overall log parsers that exists right now is an area that they could improve. Natively, there's more that could be done by Devo then what it can and can't understand from a parsing perspective.""There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler.""The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc.""Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

More Devo Cons »

"AI is superb but need improvements.""I would like to see a better GUI.""Technical support is good, but not great.""We would like to see better instrumentation for debugging changes in the log flow.""The interface is very old. IBM should remake it into a more modern interface.""There are reports that I would like to generate that are either not included, or I cannot find.""There is a lot of manual configuration required in order for the product to run smoothly, and I think that it could be made more automatic.""It is very difficult to activate all of the network equipment, and it would help if it were made easier."

More IBM QRadar Cons »

"Dashboards could be developed further.""The interface needs things like wizards that will assist with creating complex correlation rules.""The solution should offer more integrations and third-party solutions like incident response platforms or allow access to third-party big data""Nowadays the trend is going towards the ransomware and the endpoint detection and response. So if they added something for that, that will be very, very good."

More LogPoint Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We have seen ROI. We have seen cost savings in maintenance, upkeep, and support.""We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.""I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money.""It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing needs to be such that they are more competitive with other vendors.""There are additional costs, such as the cost associated with the different hardware required for implementation and deployment. Along with the add-on apps, these are all additional costs, and they require licensing as well.""In terms of additional costs, it depends on the subscription that you choose. There are plenty of options to choose from.""Our licensing costs for this solution is on a yearly basis.""It's too expensive. The licensing is also a little bit difficult to understand because you have to license it per event and per number of flows.""QRadar is quite expensive. It wouldn't be worth it for a small business...""I would like for them to lower the price.""The pricing is good."

More IBM QRadar Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Our licensing fees are about $10,000 USD per month, which I think is fair.""For a hundred user deployment the cost is about $10,000. The next year it would be the same because it's a subscription-based license. There are separate costs as well, for example, if a customer asks for training for their staff."

More LogPoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
438,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Miriam Tover
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of… more »
Top Answer: We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the… more »
Top Answer: There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the… more »
Top Answer: It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier… more »
Top Answer: The ability to transition from microscopic to macroscopic view, instantly, is very good.
Top Answer: This is not a trivial undertaking. You will need at least one experienced user and considerable infrastructure to… more »
Top Answer: Technical support is responsive and very friendly.
Top Answer: Our licensing fees are about $10,000 USD per month, which I think is fair. The licensing fees include product… more »
Top Answer: LogPoint is complex and we don't have the skills to maintain use cases or even to extend the use cases. Because of this… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 56% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
LogtrustQRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar
Learn
Devo
IBM
LogPoint
Overview

Devo unlocks the full value of machine data for the world’s most instrumented enterprises by putting more data to work now. With Devo, IT executives finally realize the transformational promise of machine data to drive breakthrough projects that move the entire business forward.

The IBM QRadar security and analytics platform is a lead offering in IBM Security's portfolio. This family of products provides consolidated flexible architecture for security teams to quickly adopt log management, SIEM, user behavior analytics, incident forensics, and threat intelligence and more. As an integrated analytics platform, QRadar streamlines critical capabilities into a common workflow, with tools such as the IBM Security App Exchange ecosystem and Watson for Cyber Security cognitive capability.

With QRadar, you can decrease your overall cost of ownership with an improved detection of threats and enjoy the flexibility of on-premise or cloud deployment, and optional managed security monitoring services.

LogPoint are SIEM specialists with solutions widely deployed in the Nordics, Germany, France and the UK.

The LogPoint solution is designed to provide you with the information you need by enabling you to collect, analyze and monitor data from your entire infrastructure for Compliance Management, Information Security, Application Security Monitoring and Operational Insight.

  • LogPoint is straightforward to buy, install and manage – so will take less of your time.
  • SIEM is all LogPoint does, so the system is up-to-date latest tech, with powerful Big Data analytics.
  • The beautiful Scandinavian design is intuitive to master, nice to look at, easy to use.
  • It’s flexible. LogPoint can manage whichever security, networking and software products you choose,
  • LogPoint works with other systems, and grows as your company or requirements grow.
  • You’ll deal with someone who genuinely understands the product and what you need from it.
  • And not least, cost. Worked out on a direct, affordable basis with no surprises later on.

For more information, please visit www.logpoint.com or contact us:

Phone: +45 7060 6100
E-mail: info@logpoint.com

Offer
See Devo in Action

See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.

Learn more about IBM QRadar
Learn more about LogPoint
Sample Customers
United States Air Force, Rubrik, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, Public Library of Science, OpenTextClients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company8%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm26%
Transportation Company14%
Health, Wellness And Fitness Company6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider16%
Media Company10%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider14%
Recreational Facilities And Services Company10%
Government7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise46%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM QRadar vs. LogPoint and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM QRadar is ranked 3rd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 31 reviews while LogPoint is ranked 20th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 4 reviews. IBM QRadar is rated 8.2, while LogPoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM QRadar writes "Enables us to handle the most critical attacks and integrates well with other solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogPoint writes "Excellent reporting features and a good dashboard". IBM QRadar is most compared with Splunk, ELK Logstash, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, ArcSight and RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM), whereas LogPoint is most compared with Splunk, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, AT&T AlienVault USM, Elastic SIEM and Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our IBM QRadar vs. LogPoint report.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.