Compare IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Enterprise Log Search

IBM QRadar is ranked 3rd in Log Management with 44 reviews while McAfee Enterprise Log Search is ranked 50th in Log Management. IBM QRadar is rated 8.4, while McAfee Enterprise Log Search is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM QRadar writes "Enables us to handle the most critical attacks and integrates well with other solutions". On the other hand, IBM QRadar is most compared with Splunk, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and ELK Logstash, whereas McAfee Enterprise Log Search is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use McAfee Enterprise Log Search? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing needs to be such that they are more competitive with other vendors.There are additional costs, such as the cost associated with the different hardware required for implementation and deployment. Along with the add-on apps, these are all additional costs, and they require licensing as well.In terms of additional costs, it depends on the subscription that you choose. There are plenty of options to choose from.Our licensing costs for this solution is on a yearly basis.It's too expensive. The licensing is also a little bit difficult to understand because you have to license it per event and per number of flows.QRadar is quite expensive. It wouldn't be worth it for a small business...I would like for them to lower the price.The pricing is good.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
out of 52 in Log Management
Views
39,911
Comparisons
27,354
Reviews
37
Average Words per Review
432
Avg. Rating
8.4
50th
out of 52 in Log Management
Views
1
Comparisons
0
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar
Learn
IBM
McAfee
Overview

The IBM QRadar security and analytics platform is a lead offering in IBM Security's portfolio. This family of products provides consolidated flexible architecture for security teams to quickly adopt log management, SIEM, user behavior analytics, incident forensics, and threat intelligence and more. As an integrated analytics platform, QRadar streamlines critical capabilities into a common workflow, with tools such as the IBM Security App Exchange ecosystem and Watson for Cyber Security cognitive capability.

With QRadar, you can decrease your overall cost of ownership with an improved detection of threats and enjoy the flexibility of on-premise or cloud deployment, and optional managed security monitoring services.

Collect the Raw Data You Need:
Collect from any source and send relevant security data you need to McAfee Enterprise Log Search.

Offer
Learn more about IBM QRadar
Learn more about McAfee Enterprise Log Search
Sample Customers
Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm26%
Transportation Company14%
Health, Wellness And Fitness Company6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company39%
Comms Service Provider16%
Media Company9%
Government5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise46%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise64%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.