Compare IBM QRadar vs. Quest InTrust
IBM QRadar is ranked 3rd in Log Management with 46 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 15th in Log Management with 1 review. IBM QRadar is rated 8.4, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM QRadar writes "Enables us to handle the most critical attacks and integrates well with other solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". IBM QRadar is most compared with Splunk, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and ELK Logstash, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Splunk, Dell InTrust and Change Auditor for Windows File Servers.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| Use Quest InTrust? Share your opinion. | ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management. Updated: October 2019. 372,185 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
Providing real-time visibility for threat detection and prioritization - QRadar SIEM provides contextual and actionable surveillance across the entire IT infrastructure. It is very stable. We have not faced interruptions in the past four and a half years. It has improved comprehensive visibility for what is going on in the perimeters, and on the inside, as well. This solution has allowed us to correlate logs from multiple sources. We get events and make the correlation, or rules. In IBM, we can implement our customer's rules. We can have very clear status threats and severity of antigens. Provided that the report is prebuilt and I can find what I am looking for, the reporting is the most valuable feature in this solution. This solution provides me with various alarms, and I have found security issues with some of my other products. It is a very optimized engine. | I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond. |
Cons | |
AI is superb but need improvements. Technical support is good, but not great. We would like to see better instrumentation for debugging changes in the log flow. The interface is very old. IBM should remake it into a more modern interface. There are reports that I would like to generate that are either not included, or I cannot find. There is a lot of manual configuration required in order for the product to run smoothly, and I think that it could be made more automatic. It is very difficult to activate all of the network equipment, and it would help if it were made easier. The tool is very complicated. One place for improvement would be to have a more user-friendly interface. Having better support in Spanish would be cool. | It needs to have better reporting. It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
The pricing needs to be such that they are more competitive with other vendors. There are additional costs, such as the cost associated with the different hardware required for implementation and deployment. Along with the add-on apps, these are all additional costs, and they require licensing as well. In terms of additional costs, it depends on the subscription that you choose. There are plenty of options to choose from. Our licensing costs for this solution is on a yearly basis. It's too expensive. The licensing is also a little bit difficult to understand because you have to license it per event and per number of flows. QRadar is quite expensive. It wouldn't be worth it for a small business... I would like for them to lower the price. The pricing is good. | Do a PoC. Make it detailed so it can help later. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs. 372,185 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 39,617 Comparisons 28,228 Reviews 38 Average Words per Review 421 Avg. Rating 8.4 | Views 501 Comparisons 339 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 164 Avg. Rating 8.0 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 34% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. | Compared 45% of the time.  Compared 22% of the time.  Compared 20% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar | |
Learn | |
| IBM | Quest Software Video Not Available |
Overview | |
The IBM QRadar security and analytics platform is a lead offering in IBM Security's portfolio. This family of products provides consolidated flexible architecture for security teams to quickly adopt log management, SIEM, user behavior analytics, incident forensics, and threat intelligence and more. As an integrated analytics platform, QRadar streamlines critical capabilities into a common workflow, with tools such as the IBM Security App Exchange ecosystem and Watson for Cyber Security cognitive capability. With QRadar, you can decrease your overall cost of ownership with an improved detection of threats and enjoy the flexibility of on-premise or cloud deployment, and optional managed security monitoring services. | InTrust is an event log management solution that addresses all of these concerns in heterogeneous environments composed of Windows, Unix and Linux servers, databases, business applications and network devices. InTrust enables you to securely collect, store, search and analyze massive amounts of IT data from numerous data sources, systems and devices in one place. Get real-time insights into user activity for security, compliance and operational visibility. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM QRadar | Learn more about Quest InTrust |
Sample Customers | |
| Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar. | Platinum Bank |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm26% Transportation Company15% Security Firm6% Comms Service Provider6% Software R&D Company28% Comms Service Provider13% Financial Services Firm11% Media Company8% | No Data Available |
Company Size | |
Small Business36% Midsize Enterprise16% Large Enterprise48% Small Business27% Midsize Enterprise22% Large Enterprise51% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management. Updated: October 2019.
372,185 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also IBM QRadar Reviews, Quest InTrust Reviews, and our list of Best Log Management Companies.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 30000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 30000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign In.