IBM QRadar vs. Quest InTrust

IBM QRadar is ranked 3rd in Log Management with 56 reviews vs Quest InTrust which is ranked 15th in Log Management with 1 review. The top reviewer of IBM QRadar writes "Correlates data across our global enterprise and integrates third-party solutions". The top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". IBM QRadar is most compared with Splunk, ArcSight and LogRhythm NextGen SIEM. Quest InTrust is most compared with Splunk, Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and Dell InTrust.

18086

IBM QRadar

Based on 56 reviews.

31881

Quest InTrust

Based on 1 review.

32614

Null Product

Most Helpful Review

Damian Scott

Sr SIEM Consultant at a tech services company

Built-in rules are enabled by default and tunable to meet the specific needs of each organization.

As a Professional Services consultant, I have heard many reports of how QRadar SIEM has quickly identified offenses which the users were unaware of... Read more »

Use Quest InTrust? Share your opinion.

Use Null Product? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management.

Download now

300,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM QRadar vs. Quest InTrust

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It is really helpful to us from the compliance point of view.The initial setup is not complex or difficult.QRadar has somewhat of a new structure recently from last gen. They have moved from the standard UI based infrastructure.It has improved my efficiency.A nice benefit is when we go to the process of selecting our youth cases, they go by building blocks. QRadar links it to building blocks.It's a state-of-the-art product for security information and event management (SIEM).There are a lot of great out-of-the-box features included.Log correlation is very useful for processing alerts. It serves to follow up alerts in real-time, building an entire workflow. Read more »	I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond. Read more »	Read more »
Cons
The tech support is not that good.The Indian tech support is not helpful.It is not app based.The initial setup was complex, and it took six months.QRadar needs a lot of fine tuningThe quality of technical support depends on the IBM support person. Sometimes, it's hard to get the right person on the other side. A ticket coordinator could be the key to better quality delivery.The released patch quality is poor. IBM should test those patches on their side, not on the client's side.Its architecture is very complicated. Read more »	It needs to have better reporting. It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. Read more »	Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The cost of this product is expensive.It is very expensive.A good approach would be to begin with an On Cloud subscription, then later on do a more exact sizing.Pricing and licensing are competitive. Their new licensing options allow logs to bypass the correlation engine for a flat rate, which is also appealing for log data that is compliance-driven for a small amount of money.Pricing (based on EPS) will be more accurate.An X-Force feed is free with QRadar.It is expensive. It is not a product that I can provide for SMBs. It is a program that I can only provide for really large enterprises.The maintenance costs are high. Read more »	Do a PoC. Make it detailed so it can help later. Read more »	Information Not Available

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 300,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd out of 38 In Log Management Views 47,409 Comparisons 26,044 Reviews 52 Followers 2,123 Avg. Rating 8.4	15th out of 38 In Log Management Views 204 Comparisons 131 Reviews 1 Followers 41 Avg. Rating 8.0	1st out of 207 In Emerging Solutions Views 0 Comparisons 0 Reviews 1 Followers 1 Avg. Rating 5.0
Top Comparisons
Splunk vs. IBM QRadar Compared 48% of the time. ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar Compared 11% of the time. LogRhythm NextGen SIEM vs. IBM QRadar Compared 11% of the time. See more IBM QRadar competitors »	Splunk vs. Quest InTrust Compared 51% of the time. Change Auditor for Windows File Servers vs. Quest InTrust Compared 20% of the time. Dell InTrust vs. Quest InTrust Compared 16% of the time. See more Quest InTrust competitors »	Veeam Backup & Replication vs. Null Product Compared 53% of the time. Zerto Virtual Replication vs. Null Product Compared 47% of the time.
Also Known As
QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar
Website/Video
IBM	Quest Software	Null Vendor
Overview
The IBM QRadar security and analytics platform is a lead offering in IBM Security's portfolio. This family of products provides consolidated flexible architecture for security teams to quickly adopt log management, SIEM, user behavior analytics, incident forensics, and threat intelligence and more. As an integrated analytics platform, QRadar streamlines critical capabilities into a common workflow, with tools such as the IBM Security App Exchange ecosystem and Watson for Cyber Security cognitive capability. With QRadar, you can decrease your overall cost of ownership with an improved detection of threats and enjoy the flexibility of on-premise or cloud deployment, and optional managed security monitoring services.	InTrust is an event log management solution that addresses all of these concerns in heterogeneous environments composed of Windows, Unix and Linux servers, databases, business applications and network devices. InTrust enables you to securely collect, store, search and analyze massive amounts of IT data from numerous data sources, systems and devices in one place. Get real-time insights into user activity for security, compliance and operational visibility.	Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about IBM QRadar Learn More	Learn more about Quest InTrust Learn More	Learn more about Null Product Learn More
Sample Customers
Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.	Platinum Bank	Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm 26% Transportation Company 19% Health, Wellness And Fitness Company 7% Security Firm 7% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Financial Services Firm 20% Comms Service Provider 13% University 6% Healthcare Company 6%	No Data Available	No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS Small Business 30% Midsize Enterprise 13% Large Enterprise 57% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business 25% Midsize Enterprise 19% Large Enterprise 57%	No Data Available	No Data Available

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management.

Download now

300,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See also IBM QRadar Reviews, Quest InTrust Reviews, and our list of Best Log Management Companies.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.