Compare IBM Rational ALM vs. IKAN ALM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Rational ALM Logo
1,830 views|1,367 comparisons
IKAN ALM Logo
56 views|21 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use IKAN ALM? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: January 2021.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,830
Comparisons
1,367
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
554
Rating
7.2
Views
56
Comparisons
21
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational ALM, MKS
Learn
IBM
IKAN
Video Not Available
Overview
Lifecycle management capabilities built on the open, unifying IBM Rational Jazz platform can help agile and traditional teams: see at-a-glance status, access better data for decisions, manage costs, reuse the most efficient processes across the organization, manage cloud, web, SOA and mobile application design and development. Teams can also gain real-time traceability, manage work across vendors, unify across a diverse set of lifecyle tools, and provide collaborative development for continuous delivery as part of the IBM DevOps solution.IKANALM is a web based, platform and environment independent DevOps solution. In the DevOps toolchain IKANALM starts where development stops and offers the ability to tailor your life cycle, project by project, has build, deploy, approval and notification capabilities using the unique IKANALM Phases concept. Through its integration facilities IKANALM is the perfect Orchestration tool to offer an end-to-end DevOps toolchain. By integrating with these toolchain tools it serves as an end-to-end DevOps Orchestration tool. Toolchain tools supported are: issue tracking, versioning, testing, containers… Last but not least, IKANALM has out-of-the-box DevOps solutions for IBM mainframe legacy systems, SAP, IBM Websphere and Oracle Data Integrator. IKANALM works on premise or can work Cloud based.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational ALM
Learn more about IKAN ALM
Sample Customers
Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, AshurstConstellation Brands, USA/ GMF, France/ Reale Mutua, Italy/ Vivium, Belgium and TATA STEEL, Holland
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Manufacturing Company15%
Comms Service Provider11%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise63%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: January 2021.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational ALM is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 6 reviews while IKAN ALM is ranked 29th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. IBM Rational ALM is rated 7.2, while IKAN ALM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational ALM writes "Helped with time management, improved our resource utility, and helped assure on-time completion". On the other hand, IBM Rational ALM is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, PTC Integrity, TFS and codeBeamer ALM, whereas IKAN ALM is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.