Compare IBM Rational ALM vs. Jama Connect

IBM Rational ALM is ranked 7th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 5 reviews while Jama Connect is ranked 13th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 3 reviews. IBM Rational ALM is rated 7.0, while Jama Connect is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational ALM writes "Helped with time management, improved our resource utility, and helped assure on-time completion". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "An excellent cloud solution that is a very user friendly and mature". IBM Rational ALM is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, TFS, PTC Integrity and codeBeamer ALM, whereas Jama Connect is most compared with Jira, IBM Rational DOORS, Polarion Requirements, codeBeamer ALM and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation. See our IBM Rational ALM vs. Jama Connect report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Rational ALM Logo
1,772 views|1,322 comparisons
Jama Connect Logo
3,987 views|3,251 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational ALM vs. Jama Connect and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,175 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the reporting of the CPU usage on the dashboard.At the same time, if you're working from the architect or the designing team you, it's quite easy to manage the resources online.It helped us contain critical things, like source code and several documents, which is very important to us.It is relatively easy to use and user-friendly once the setup is complete.The cataloging is a very valuable feature. For a lot of enterprises, they end up not knowing which applications do specific features. The cataloging helps with this. It's not that verbose, but it still gives you allowances to put in more detail.

More IBM Rational ALM Pros »

The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface.Technical support answers fairly quickly compared to others like IBM or Atlassian. They also offer quite a good knowledge base for advanced cases and how to plan it, etc. via videos that they provide. They are quite useful.

More Jama Connect Pros »

Cons
The stability of this solution can be improved.The directory designer manager is uncivil. The design manager is clearly really unstable.Of course it would be related to customer experience. The solution is not user friendly at all. It needs an expert to use it, although the reporting feature was okay.There is not enough beginner support material in the form of FAQs or simple training to help you get started.The features should be more intuitive. If I'm looking for something, its location should be easy to locate.

More IBM Rational ALM Cons »

I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved.t is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved. It doesn't have a nice way of viewing information. We would like to see better interfaces for consuming information.Test management can be improved. It's not so scalable. The user interface needs to split things into small projects.

More Jama Connect Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews.

More Jama Connect Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
431,175 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,772
Comparisons
1,322
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
564
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
3,987
Comparisons
3,251
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
435
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational ALM, MKS
Learn
IBM
Jama
Overview
Lifecycle management capabilities built on the open, unifying IBM Rational Jazz platform can help agile and traditional teams: see at-a-glance status, access better data for decisions, manage costs, reuse the most efficient processes across the organization, manage cloud, web, SOA and mobile application design and development. Teams can also gain real-time traceability, manage work across vendors, unify across a diverse set of lifecyle tools, and provide collaborative development for continuous delivery as part of the IBM DevOps solution.Web-based requirements management application designed to help you increase collaboration, manage complexity and fuel innovation.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational ALM
Learn more about Jama Connect
Sample Customers
Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, AshurstDeloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company6%
Retailer6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Manufacturing Company18%
Healthcare Company11%
Media Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational ALM vs. Jama Connect and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,175 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.