Compare IBM Rational ALM vs. PTC Integrity

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Rational ALM Logo
1,830 views|1,367 comparisons
PTC Integrity Logo
2,176 views|1,527 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use PTC Integrity? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational ALM vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The cataloging is a very valuable feature. For a lot of enterprises, they end up not knowing which applications do specific features. The cataloging helps with this. It's not that verbose, but it still gives you allowances to put in more detail.""It is relatively easy to use and user-friendly once the setup is complete.""It helped us contain critical things, like source code and several documents, which is very important to us.""At the same time, if you're working from the architect or the designing team you, it's quite easy to manage the resources online.""The most valuable feature is the reporting of the CPU usage on the dashboard.""You can customize the board according to your needs."

More IBM Rational ALM Pros »

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.""We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client.""Complete traceability as per process requirements.""The tool is quite structured and has a good command set.""The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project.""It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks."

More PTC Integrity Pros »

Cons
"The features should be more intuitive. If I'm looking for something, its location should be easy to locate.""There is not enough beginner support material in the form of FAQs or simple training to help you get started.""Of course it would be related to customer experience. The solution is not user friendly at all. It needs an expert to use it, although the reporting feature was okay.""The directory designer manager is uncivil. The design manager is clearly really unstable.""The stability of this solution can be improved.""The reporting functionality needs to be improved."

More IBM Rational ALM Cons »

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.""It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer.""There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA.""I would like to see better integration from the architectural side.""We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all.""It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."

More PTC Integrity Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks.
Top Answer: It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use. For example, if I need to attach pictures then relate items… more »
Top Answer: Our primary use case is to develop tasks and controls.
Ranking
Views
1,830
Comparisons
1,367
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
554
Rating
7.2
Views
2,176
Comparisons
1,527
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
387
Rating
6.7
Popular Comparisons
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational ALM, MKSMKS
Learn
IBM
PTC
Overview
Lifecycle management capabilities built on the open, unifying IBM Rational Jazz platform can help agile and traditional teams: see at-a-glance status, access better data for decisions, manage costs, reuse the most efficient processes across the organization, manage cloud, web, SOA and mobile application design and development. Teams can also gain real-time traceability, manage work across vendors, unify across a diverse set of lifecyle tools, and provide collaborative development for continuous delivery as part of the IBM DevOps solution.The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational ALM
Learn more about PTC Integrity
Sample Customers
Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, AshurstTRW Automotive
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Manufacturing Company16%
Comms Service Provider10%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company50%
Aerospace/Defense Firm20%
Manufacturing Company20%
Engineering Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company11%
Transportation Company10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise63%
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Large Enterprise80%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational ALM vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational ALM is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 6 reviews while PTC Integrity is ranked 13th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 6 reviews. IBM Rational ALM is rated 7.2, while PTC Integrity is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of IBM Rational ALM writes "Helped with time management, improved our resource utility, and helped assure on-time completion". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Good item management and version control but does not have good performance ". IBM Rational ALM is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, TFS, codeBeamer ALM and Polarion ALM, whereas PTC Integrity is most compared with Jira, Polarion ALM, codeBeamer ALM, Microsoft Azure DevOps and TFS. See our IBM Rational ALM vs. PTC Integrity report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.