IBM Rational ALM vs TFS

IBM Rational ALM is ranked 12th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review vs TFS which is ranked 4th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 28 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational ALM writes "Rich planning features including Sprint, Sprint retrospective, and rules in Scrum framework". The top reviewer of TFS writes "Can Provide A Centralized Place To Store All Source Code And Build Information For Entire Organization". IBM Rational ALM is most compared with JIRA, Micro Focus ALM and TFS. TFS is most compared with JIRA, Micro Focus ALM and CA Agile Central.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, CA Technologies and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational ALM vs TFS

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The planning feature is rich with Scrum concepts: Sprint, Sprint retrospective, the rules in the Scrum framework.

Read more »

From the project management perspective, the tool is efficiently managing teams by giving management information, such as reports, graphs, velocity, capacity, etc.The biggest value-add is the solution integrates well with most Microsoft products.Build definitions and releases within the product. allow us to put our latest applications in the field.It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use.Complete integration with VS IDE and Office tools: This give us a possibility of high-level automation, thus minimizing human error.Version Control: TFS offers both the centralized “TFVC” version control technology as well as the distributed “Git” version control technology.I like its MTM (Microsoft Test Manager) section which gives us options to create various test plans and add test cases into it.The API for managing TFS programmatically is very powerful, you can listen on work items changes by TFS events.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see better reporting features. The out-of-box reporting is - I don't want to say limited - but the focus is on the Scrum and Sprint reports. We need more reporting features regarding the history of the work, tracking it more deeply.

Read more »

More options could be provided from the perspective of requirements management, which would help product owners to use the tool effectively.Since it is Microsoft, it is technology agnostic, thus it does not really fit into various different technologies in the organization.We are also using Microsoft Teams. The two products function separately. There is not enough collaboration between Microsoft Teams and TFS.TFS on-premise does not support integration with SharePoint Online.Not all of the functionality, which is exposed by the command line interface (tf.exe) is available in the Visual Studio GUI.TFS and MTM have their own style of working and they are different from other tools like Jira or TestRail, which are simpler and easy to use.Sometimes we feel that it need more CPU, and RAMs on TFS server, either we implemented the hardware with the product minimum requirements.Microsoft should discontinue the use of SharePoint as I don’t really see any value add to TFS, document management features can be included in TFS web portal itself, if required!

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It is pretty expensive compared to other project management tools.If running TFS on-premise is expensive, maybe you could consider moving to the Cloud and use the Visual Studio Team Services.Use the Microsoft recommended “seat-based” licensing model. This allows a single developer with multiple machines to consume only one client license.TFS is on the higher side, but if you intend to use the tool as a complete ALM tool, it will reduce your costs in the long run.It's just as expensive as HPE ALM, without many of the features, best used for development tool only to avoid higher costs.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
1,747
Comparisons
1,187
Reviews
1
Followers
288
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
30,790
Comparisons
22,163
Reviews
27
Followers
1,348
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
See more IBM Rational ALM competitors »
Compared 64% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
See more TFS competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsRational ALM, MKSTeam Foundation Server
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
Microsoft
Overview
OverviewLifecycle management capabilities built on the open, unifying IBM Rational Jazz platform can help agile and traditional teams: see at-a-glance status, access better data for decisions, manage costs, reuse the most efficient processes across the organization, manage cloud, web, SOA and mobile application design and development. Teams can also gain real-time traceability, manage work across vendors, unify across a diverse set of lifecyle tools, and provide collaborative development for continuous delivery as part of the IBM DevOps solution.Visual Studio Team Foundation Server (TFS) is the collaboration platform at the core of Microsoft's application lifecycle management (ALM) solution. TFS supports agile development practices, multiple IDEs and platforms locally or in the cloud and gives you the tools you need to effectively manage software development projects throughout the IT lifecycle.
OFFER
Learn more about IBM Rational ALM
Learn more about TFS
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersTennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, AshurstVendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
40%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Software R&D Company
10%
Retailer
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Insurance Company
8%
Healthcare Company
5%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
23%
Large Enterprise
65%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
11%
Midsize Enterprise
17%
Large Enterprise
72%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, CA Technologies and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
Download now
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email