We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Build Forge and Incredibuild based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."All features are useful. Our customer doesn't have any complaints about the tool. It works pretty well for what they want and what they need to do."
"Very good reporting features."
"It is saving time for developers, which is saving money for the company."
"Not user friendly for the layman."
"Its logging can be improved. When something goes wrong, it is not always very easy to find the problem. It is hard to identify whether the problem is because of low memory in the server or some configuration in Rational Build Forge. The error logs are not very detailed, and they should provide more information. It should also have more integration with third-party tools. It would be great to have more integration with third-party tools."
"Stability could be improved. I don't know the reason for the instability because there are no logs that help me to understand the problem."
IBM Rational Build Forge is ranked 19th in Build Automation while Incredibuild is ranked 20th in Build Automation. IBM Rational Build Forge is rated 9.0, while Incredibuild is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Build Forge writes "Great reporting features and very functional". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Incredibuild writes "Saves time for developers, which saves money for the company". IBM Rational Build Forge is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo and Digital.ai Release , whereas Incredibuild is most compared with Bazel, TeamCity, Jenkins and GitLab.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.