Compare IBM Rational Build Forge vs. Oracle Hudson CI

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Chef, Jenkins, GitLab and others in Build Automation. Updated: August 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
out of 31 in Build Automation
Views
1,149
Comparisons
1,070
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
486
Avg. Rating
10.0
18th
out of 31 in Build Automation
Views
392
Comparisons
344
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 81% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Build ForgeHudson CI
Learn
IBM
Oracle
Overview

IBM Rational Build Forge is an adaptive execution framework that helps automate and standardize the software assembly process. Rational Build Forge helps teams standardize repetitive tasks, improve software quality and manage compliance mandates. This software scales to 25 seats. Rational Build Forge delivers:
Flexibility - gives developers self-service access to preconfigured build processes from within their integrated development environment (IDE). You can add IBM Rational software products to further enhance automation, reporting and integration.
Productivity - accelerates build and release cycles through iterative development, parallel processes and efficient use of hardware.
Compliance - simplifies compliance management with self-documenting audit trails and role-based security.
Compatibility - increases team efficiency with centralized build and release management using the tools you have today.

Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

  • Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
  • Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Build Forge
Learn more about Oracle Hudson CI
Sample Customers
Cars.comVirgin Media
Find out what your peers are saying about Chef, Jenkins, GitLab and others in Build Automation. Updated: August 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Rational Build Forge is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 1 review while Oracle Hudson CI is ranked 18th in Build Automation. IBM Rational Build Forge is rated 10.0, while Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Build Forge writes "Great reporting features and very functional". On the other hand, IBM Rational Build Forge is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo and CircleCI, whereas Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with Jenkins.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.