IBM Rational ClearCase vs IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Daniel Antonio Jimenez Quintana
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability.
Top Answer:I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly.
Top Answer:We are using IBM Rational ClearCase in Peru at two large banks for a code repository. However, it is not meant to be used as a repository.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
786
Comparisons
567
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
255
Rating
5.0
Unranked
In Software Configuration Management
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational ClearCase
Rational RequisitePro
Learn More
IBM
Video Not Available
Overview

IBM Rational ClearCase is an enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets, including requirements, design documents, models, test plans and test results. It be can be integrated with other IBM solutions, including IBM Rational Team Concert, IBM Rational ClearQuest, IBM Rational Asset Manager and IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Software.

IBM Rational RequisitePro, a requirements management tool that teams can use to manage project requirements comprehensively in order to promote communication and collaboration among team members and reduce project risk. Requirements management is essential for improving your software development process. Rational RequisitePro uses a project database for managing requirements in views with sort and query capabilities. It also includes integration with Microsoft Word for creating and maintaining requirements documents that are linked to the database for real-time updates to requirements from within documents. The database and Word integration helps you organize and prioritize your requirements, trace relationships between them, and track changes that affect them. Traceability features visually indicate how changes affect the project, thereby helping to perform impact analysis and make informed decisions for scope management or resource allocation. Rational RequisitePro captures the change history for each requirement, thereby providing a paper audit of the evolution of project requirements.
Sample Customers
Atos SE, FEI, STM
Balfour Beatty, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company23%
Computer Software Company13%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available

IBM Rational ClearCase is ranked 4th in Software Configuration Management with 5 reviews while IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Configuration Management. IBM Rational ClearCase is rated 6.4, while IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational ClearCase writes "Difficult to use, not efficient, but stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] writes "Provides traceability for internal applications". IBM Rational ClearCase is most compared with Git, Bitbucket, GitHub, IBM Rational ClearQuest and Helix Core, whereas IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.