Compare IBM Rational ClearQuest vs. NMQA QABook

IBM Rational ClearQuest is ranked 2nd in Defect Tracking while NMQA QABook is ranked 3rd in Defect Tracking. IBM Rational ClearQuest is rated 0, while NMQA QABook is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM Rational ClearQuest is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, Jira, IBM Engineering Workflow Management and ISC Software JCL Checker, whereas NMQA QABook is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Rational ClearQuest Logo
1,696 views|1,385 comparisons
NMQA QABook Logo
84 views|42 comparisons
Ranking
2nd
out of 9 in Defect Tracking
Views
1,696
Comparisons
1,385
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
3rd
out of 9 in Defect Tracking
Views
84
Comparisons
42
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 36% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational ClearQuestQABook
Learn
IBM
NMQA
Video Not Available
Overview

IBM Rational ClearQuest is a fully customizable database workflow application development and production system. It provides flexible change and defect tracking, customizable processes, near real-time reporting and lifecycle traceability for better visibility and control of the software development lifecycle. IBM Rational ClearQuest provides scalable, multiplatform support to any size organization so you can continue to customize processes as your development needs evolve.

Test management product that is offered on premises or in the cloud via desktop, Microsoft SharePoint, or the web.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational ClearQuest
Learn more about NMQA QABook
Sample Customers
Atos SE, STM, Regence BlueCross BlueShieldCapgemini, Queensland Government, Etihad Airways, CGI

See our list of best Defect Tracking vendors.

We monitor all Defect Tracking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.