Compare IBM Rational ClearQuest vs. Usersnap

IBM Rational ClearQuest is ranked 1st in Defect Tracking while Usersnap is ranked 8th in Defect Tracking. IBM Rational ClearQuest is rated 0, while Usersnap is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM Rational ClearQuest is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, JIRA and IBM Engineering Workflow Management, whereas Usersnap is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Rational ClearQuest Logo
1,756 views|1,429 comparisons
Usersnap Logo
36 views|9 comparisons
Ranking
1st
out of 8 in Defect Tracking
Views
1,756
Comparisons
1,429
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
193
Avg. Rating
9.0
8th
out of 8 in Defect Tracking
Views
36
Comparisons
9
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational ClearQuest
Learn
IBM
Usersnap
Overview

IBM Rational ClearQuest is a fully customizable database workflow application development and production system. It provides flexible change and defect tracking, customizable processes, near real-time reporting and lifecycle traceability for better visibility and control of the software development lifecycle. IBM Rational ClearQuest provides scalable, multiplatform support to any size organization so you can continue to customize processes as your development needs evolve.

Usersnap is a central place to organize & track bugs and collect user feedback. Key features include: Real-time collaboration, Contextual information, ad-hoc feedback widget and seamless integration.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational ClearQuest
Learn more about Usersnap
Sample Customers
Atos SE, STM, Regence BlueCross BlueShieldGoogle, Erstes, Microsoft, Runtastic, Onshape, Talkdesk, Fast Company, Hawaiian Airlines
We monitor all Defect Tracking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.