We performed a comparison between IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management."IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is easier to expand to build a backend with several servers, so you can also use it to scale up to several hundreds of users without major problems."
"One of the most valuable features is how you can tailor the modules."
"There are many good features with DOORS. The solution has a concept of streams and baselines, as well as a concept of components. A component is a subproject inside a project."
"The "Link by Attribute" feature is useful for making links without needing to use the web interface manually."
"As far as maintaining our requirements so that we can have copies of them, it's good. I can print it out if necessary."
"The most valuable features are the versioning of requirements and the possibility to reuse them."
"My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive."
"It's web-based, so you don't have anything to install."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."
"Both the data storage and reporting for this solution need improvement."
"The only additional feature would be if it had dynamic linking to other MBSE tool sets or industry-leading tools."
"I have come to the conclusion that if you are considering migrating from DOORS to DNG, don't! Instead of spending 100's to 1000's of hours doing migrations, invest those hours in a DXL programmer to make DOORS do what it isn't doing for you now."
"There is room for improvement in the APIs that they have exposed for integration."
"As a web tool, DNG can be difficult to use if the server is loaded or your network connection to it is saturated."
"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation has room for improvement compared to other tools like Polaris and Jama Connect. These tools offer more flexibility and options for developers, which IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation lacks. For example, you can define your link rules in Jama Connect, but you can't do that in IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation."
"Be very careful how you load your DNG server. There are limits to the number of artifacts a server can handle."
"When you are in Jira or Confluence, you have some freedom in how you type in text. That's also a weakness of Confluence, however, as it opens the doors to sloppy work. In DOS Next Generation, the text is very rigorous, but it might be difficult for people who don't have the discipline. Having a way to quickly enter requirements could help. It might already be in there, but I don't know. I don't have enough experience with the tool yet."
"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."
More IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is ranked 4th in Application Requirements Management with 12 reviews while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is ranked 6th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is rated 7.8, while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation writes "An industry-leading tool to demonstrate traceability between requirements, with valuable features for tailoring modules and managing several thousand requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity Requirements Connector writes "A requirement management tool that provides a good technical support along with stability". IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jama Connect, Jira and Polarion Requirements, whereas PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS and Jira.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
