IBM Rational DOORS vs JIRA

IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 3rd in Application Requirements Management with 2 reviews vs JIRA which is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 23 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes "DOORS is highly customize-able, better than DNG, but maybe not the tool for distributed teams". The top reviewer of JIRA writes "Using this for backlog prioritization is the key to either kanban or scrum processes". IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with JIRA, Jama and Polarion Requirements. JIRA is most compared with TFS, Micro Focus ALM and IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM). See our IBM Rational DOORS vs JIRA report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational DOORS vs JIRA and others in Application Requirements Management.
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational DOORS vs JIRA

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Traceability on requirements for a huge project in an organization is a big gain.

Read more »

Reporting: It gives a nice report of my backlog and what my team has currently spent its efforts on.It benefits us because we have globally located teams. Our team members work in different geographies, so the product is a better way to manage progress and see the status of different tasksWe can cope with processes easily without adapting the tool, but adapting the tool to processes.The ability to change and rewrite tasks is valuable. You can add a lot of columns, change the owners and the change the components.JQL, JIRA Query Language enables me to filter all the issues, display the items as I want.It's very flexible. I can define workflows and custom fields and dependencies between issues and projects. And every project can have a custom configuration with my fields, my names for fields, my validations, and my workflows. It's very customizable.I found it super useful, as it is customizable for different teams and users.It improved communication, as it was a popular tool, and most people enjoyed using it.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see them improve in agile management the Scrum/Kanban Board to work with overseas team members.

Read more »

JIRA still has their own backtracking tools. It should have a better visibility into HPE UFT. Most people use functional testing tools, like QTP. They need to improve their integration to make it seamless.There is a difficulty viewing all the attachments because they are shown in one place. I would like attachments to be shown at the comment level.Sometimes, it is slow and hangs. We faced some stability issues where JIRA was down for a day. Also, we have lost some of our comments made in the JIRA because of downtime.There are no fields to search or to filter by, mainly the ones which use a data around a date and time when something changes.I would like to see it connecting to Git. That could be useful. We use it for Stash, but I think there is one for Git also. I don't know if it's a plug-in that exists already, but that could be nice.The following definitely need improvement: UI, speed, and mobile app functionality.Out-of-the-box reporting is limited. It would be helpful if more customisation was possible.​I would like integrated requirements management, so we do not have to buy plug-ins for JIRA, since it was hard to get requirements management for it.​

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
I understand JIRA is quite expensive.It does not cost that much.Almost everybody uses JIRA nowadays because it is the most cost-effective solution.The licensing model is annoying. They nickel and dime you.It is very cheap if you forego the local instance and stick to the cloud.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
15,423
Comparisons
6,538
Reviews
3
Followers
355
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
67,454
Comparisons
43,854
Reviews
21
Followers
1,822
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
See more IBM Rational DOORS competitors »
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
See more JIRA competitors »
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
Atlassian
Overview
OverviewIBM Rational DOORS is a requirements management application for optimizing requirements communication, collaboration and verification throughout your organization and supply chain. This scalable solution can help you meet business goals by managing project scope and cost. Rational DOORS lets you capture, trace, analyze and manage changes to information while maintaining compliance to regulations and standards. Rational DOORS provides requirements management in a centralized location for better team collaboration, and traceability by linking requirements to design items, test plans, test cases and other requirements. It also provides scalability to address your changing requirements management needs, test tracking toolkit for manual test environments to link requirements to test cases, and integrations to help manage changes to requirements with either a simple pre-defined change proposal system or a more thorough, customizable change control workflow with Rational change management solutions.

JIRA has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs.

Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure.

For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale.

Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers.

OFFER
Learn more about IBM Rational DOORS
Learn more about JIRA
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersInfosys, Chevrolet VoltSquare, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Aerospace/Defense Firm
38%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Individual & Family Service
13%
Financial Services Firm
6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Aerospace/Defense Firm
29%
Transportation Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
6%
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company
16%
Healthcare Company
16%
Software R&D Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
Insurance Company
6%
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
9%
Large Enterprise
73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
17%
Midsize Enterprise
10%
Large Enterprise
73%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
33%
Midsize Enterprise
16%
Large Enterprise
51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
21%
Midsize Enterprise
18%
Large Enterprise
61%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational DOORS vs JIRA and others in Application Requirements Management.
Download now
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email