IBM Rational DOORS vs JIRA

IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 3rd in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews vs JIRA which is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 17 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes "DOORS is highly customize-able, better than DNG, but maybe not the tool for distributed teams". The top reviewer of JIRA writes "Using this for backlog prioritization is the key to either kanban or scrum processes". IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with JIRA, IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] and Jama. JIRA is most compared with TFS, Micro Focus ALM and IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM). See our IBM Rational DOORS vs JIRA report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review

Looking for a deeper dive into
Application Requirements Management?

Ibm rational doors vs. jira report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational DOORS vs JIRA

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Traceability on requirements for a huge project in an organization is a big gain.

Read more »

It is very flexible, so we can do pretty much what we want with it.It handles all of the issues that we need it to do.It helps me to use virtual Scrum boards across four locations, three time zones, and to plan my work. It fully supports the Scrum approach, and the Agile way of working, and it has Agile thinking behind it..It gave us control over all test artifacts in one place, along with easy traceability, mapping between stories, bugs, test cases, and test cycles.The traceability mapping feature is something that became very useful, especially during releases and bug fixes.JIRA stores history of changes, which helps a lot to track who, when, and why the issue was modified​.Reports, analytics, and a ton of widgets, they are great and intuitive. Perfect for an agile team.For QA, the most interesting for me are boards, backlog, and filters.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see them improve in agile management the Scrum/Kanban Board to work with overseas team members.

Read more »

​I would like integrated requirements management, so we do not have to buy plug-ins for JIRA, since it was hard to get requirements management for it.​I do know the initial setup was pretty complicated. The user interface could be better organized and easier. ​I struggle with Epics, how they are implemented in JIRA, because they don't work like any other Story, I see a list of Epics, but although I can order them, there are some mismatches with how the Epics are used compared to what Scrum expects, or what Story mapping expects an Epic to be.I would like to see visualization of release planning. I can list the releases and I can give dates to releases, but to show how they are happening on a timeline, I would need to order the Portfolio part. But just for this, it may be too much to use the Portfolio for that.It should have its own repository for test case creation, so that one does not have to resort to third-party tools and plugins.I would love to have more features to make nice documents, like Release Notes or a feature overview, right from JIRA.Grid: It is really strange that there is no possibility to edit an item in the grid. You need to go inside, and even then, not all items are editable, so you need to switch to edit mode. That's too many clicks and switches.I would like to see test execution modules.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It does not cost that much.Almost everybody uses JIRA nowadays because it is the most cost-effective solution.The licensing model is annoying. They nickel and dime you.It is very cheap if you forego the local instance and stick to the cloud.

Read more »

Looking for a deeper dive into
Application Requirements Management?

Ibm rational doors vs. jira report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
14,185
Comparisons
6,559
Reviews
4
Followers
396
Avg. Rating
8.3
Views
61,155
Comparisons
44,516
Reviews
17
Followers
2,281
Avg. Rating
8.1
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Atlassian logo
Compared 27% of the time.
Lh hh5yl 400x400
Compared 14% of the time.
See more IBM Rational DOORS competitors »
Microsoft 400x400
Compared 34% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 20% of the time.
See more JIRA competitors »
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1524637054
Atlassian
  • Vendor 6900 screenshot 1524936662
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewIBM Rational DOORS is a requirements management application for optimizing requirements communication, collaboration and verification throughout your organization and supply chain. This scalable solution can help you meet business goals by managing project scope and cost. Rational DOORS lets you capture, trace, analyze and manage changes to information while maintaining compliance to regulations and standards. Rational DOORS provides requirements management in a centralized location for better team collaboration, and traceability by linking requirements to design items, test plans, test cases and other requirements. It also provides scalability to address your changing requirements management needs, test tracking toolkit for manual test environments to link requirements to test cases, and integrations to help manage changes to requirements with either a simple pre-defined change proposal system or a more thorough, customizable change control workflow with Rational change management solutions.

JIRA has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs.

Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure.

For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale.

Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers.

OFFER
Learn more about IBM Rational DOORS
Learn more about JIRA
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersInfosys, Chevrolet VoltSquare, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Aerospace/Defense Firm
53%
Engineering Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
5%
University
5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Aerospace/Defense Firm
30%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Transportation Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
6%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Insurance Company
15%
Healthcare Company
15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
9%
Large Enterprise
73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
17%
Midsize Enterprise
10%
Large Enterprise
73%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
38%
Midsize Enterprise
15%
Large Enterprise
46%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
19%
Large Enterprise
61%

Looking for a deeper dive into
Application Requirements Management?

Ibm rational doors vs. jira report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email