Compare IBM Rational Focal Point vs. Inflectra SpiraTest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Broadcom and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: June 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The reporting functionality helps vendors and technical resources identify bugs and issues that need to be addressed. The simple dashboard-style home page makes training end-user testers simple and… more »
Top Answer: The UI for managing test cases, test sets, test runs could be a little more integrated, currently, these feel disjointed at times and confusing. Also, the test steps page needs to display the test… more »
Top Answer: Testing of new applications being deployed in a healthcare environment. SpiraTest is used to help manage our testing process for not only new software implementations but also for checking the… more »
Ranking
Views
97
Comparisons
67
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,185
Comparisons
751
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
626
Rating
9.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Focal Point
SpiraTest, Spira
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational Focal Point is a comprehensive portfolio planning solution for market-driven teams. With Rational Focal Point, teams can make collaborative, objective decisions to deliver market, customer, and business value. By understanding what matters most, your organization can respond to dynamic market conditions and deliver valued products and projects.
SpiraTest is an integrated Requirements and Quality Management solution that manages your project's Requirements, Test Cases, Releases, Defects and Issues in one environment, with complete traceability throughout. After defining your project's requirements, you generate the test cases and test steps that validate the functionality. The test execution modules allows users to run through the tests, logging defects/issues as they go. SpiraTest is Fully Web-Based. Free 30-Day Trial.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Focal Point
Learn more about Inflectra SpiraTest
Sample Customers
SanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, Swedbank
- Morningstar - Deutsch Bank - Sopra Group - Booz Allen & Hamilton - UBS - US Government
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company20%
Marketing Services Firm20%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider25%
Government11%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise48%
Large Enterprise26%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Broadcom and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: June 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Focal Point is ranked 15th in Application Requirements Management while Inflectra SpiraTest is ranked 4th in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews. IBM Rational Focal Point is rated 0.0, while Inflectra SpiraTest is rated 9.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inflectra SpiraTest writes "User friendly with ease of testing requirements management, migration from other tools and als othe integration with other testing tools". IBM Rational Focal Point is most compared with Jira, whereas Inflectra SpiraTest is most compared with Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, Micro Focus ALM Octane and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.