• Home
  • IBM Rational Focal Point vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform

IBM Rational Focal Point vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Focal Point and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM Rational Focal Point?
Edmund Suarez
Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable
Our customers require that we perform static analysis and have no critical high errors. We must also have 100 percent code coverage for my test to... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Parasoft Development Testing Platform?
Top Answer:The most valuable feature is code coverage.
What needs improvement with Parasoft Development Testing Platform?
Top Answer:The solution's speed has room for improvement.
What is your primary use case for Parasoft Development Testing Platform?
Top Answer:We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
Ranking
14th
out of 17 in Application Requirements Management
Views
97
Comparisons
57
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
10th
out of 17 in Application Requirements Management
Views
100
Comparisons
77
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
217
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Focal Point
Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
Learn More
IBM
Parasoft
Overview
IBM Rational Focal Point is a comprehensive portfolio planning solution for market-driven teams. With Rational Focal Point, teams can make collaborative, objective decisions to deliver market, customer, and business value. By understanding what matters most, your organization can respond to dynamic market conditions and deliver valued products and projects.

Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

- Preconfigured compliance reporting

- Customized Advanced Analytics

- Interactive Navigation of Results

- Traceability

Sample Customers
SanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, Swedbank
General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Focal Point is ranked 14th in Application Requirements Management while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 10th in Application Requirements Management with 4 reviews. IBM Rational Focal Point is rated 0.0, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". IBM Rational Focal Point is most compared with , whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.