Compare IBM Rational Focal Point vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform

IBM Rational Focal Point is ranked 15th in Application Requirements Management while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 14th in Application Requirements Management. IBM Rational Focal Point is rated 0, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM Rational Focal Point is most compared with Jira, whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Jira, SoapUI Pro and TestRail by Gurock.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
158
Comparisons
102
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
522
Comparisons
265
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Broadcom and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: June 2020.
425,338 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Focal PointParasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
Learn
IBM
Parasoft
Overview
IBM Rational Focal Point is a comprehensive portfolio planning solution for market-driven teams. With Rational Focal Point, teams can make collaborative, objective decisions to deliver market, customer, and business value. By understanding what matters most, your organization can respond to dynamic market conditions and deliver valued products and projects.Parasoft Concerto is a Software Development Management infrastructure that increases productivity and reduces costs. Parasoft Concerto complements an organization's existing technical infrastructure, connecting distributed components in order to better facilitate natural human workflow. Parasoft Concerto manages "what" needs to be accomplished within the context of "how" management expects those tasks to be accomplished.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Focal Point
Learn more about Parasoft Development Testing Platform
Sample Customers
SanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, SwedbankComcast, Lufthansa, Samsung,CAE, Canon, FedEx
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Broadcom and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: June 2020.
425,338 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.