Compare IBM Rational Focal Point vs. Polarion Requirements

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Broadcom and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: June 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."

More Polarion Requirements Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable.
Top Answer: It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions.
Top Answer: Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature.
Ranking
Views
97
Comparisons
67
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,904
Comparisons
2,321
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
472
Rating
6.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Focal Point
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational Focal Point is a comprehensive portfolio planning solution for market-driven teams. With Rational Focal Point, teams can make collaborative, objective decisions to deliver market, customer, and business value. By understanding what matters most, your organization can respond to dynamic market conditions and deliver valued products and projects.
Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Focal Point
Learn more about Polarion Requirements
Sample Customers
SanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, Swedbank
NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company26%
Comms Service Provider20%
Computer Software Company19%
Real Estate/Law Firm4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Broadcom and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: June 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Focal Point is ranked 15th in Application Requirements Management while Polarion Requirements is ranked 8th in Application Requirements Management with 4 reviews. IBM Rational Focal Point is rated 0.0, while Polarion Requirements is rated 6.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion Requirements writes "Well-structured, but the import feature and the dashboards need to be improved". IBM Rational Focal Point is most compared with Jira, whereas Polarion Requirements is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, Jama Connect and Helix ALM.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.