Compare IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. Inflectra Rapise

IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Inflectra Rapise is ranked 30th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.6, while Inflectra Rapise is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Good coverage and compatibility with excellent stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "Good database management with a straightforward setup, but maintenance is a challenge". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, HCL OneTest, SmartBear TestComplete and Katalon Studio, whereas Inflectra Rapise is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ and Ranorex Studio.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Inflectra Rapise? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: June 2020.
425,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good.The most valuable feature is the UI component tester.

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pros »

It's pretty straightforward to set up.

More Inflectra Rapise Pros »

Cons
If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility.As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support.

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Cons »

The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had.

More Inflectra Rapise Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price.

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
425,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
24th
Views
2,210
Comparisons
1,611
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
570
Avg. Rating
7.5
30th
Views
450
Comparisons
267
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
420
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Functional TesterRapise
Learn
IBM
Inflectra
Overview
IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Learn more about Inflectra Rapise
Sample Customers
Edumate- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company42%
Transportation Company10%
Government10%
Healthcare Company9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: June 2020.
425,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.