Compare IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. Inflectra Rapise

IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools while Inflectra Rapise is ranked 34th in Functional Testing Tools. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 0, while Inflectra Rapise is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, UFT (QTP) and Katalon Studio, whereas Inflectra Rapise is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
27th
Views
2,715
Comparisons
1,944
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
34th
Views
606
Comparisons
341
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Worksoft, Micro Focus, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Functional TesterRapise
Learn
IBM
Inflectra
Overview
IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Learn more about Inflectra Rapise
Sample Customers
Edumate- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government
Find out what your peers are saying about Worksoft, Micro Focus, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email