Compare IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. mabl

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Worksoft Certify Logo
13,683 views|4,567 comparisons
mabl Logo
183 views|139 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The initial investment is probably a little high. It was a little hard for me to sell, but it was a one-shot deal and that's why it's so high. All we are doing now is paying annual maintenance, which we don't have to do if we don't want upgrades, but we do.""Purchasing and licensing are okay. Go for the perpetual licenses. In that way, you own a license, then you can purchase maintenance and support on top of that, so you don't have to pay every year for it. Even if you don't want it a contract with Worksoft Certify in the future, you will have your own license of it. Then, if your usage is not that much, you can have one or two perpetual licenses. However, if you want to run your processes, you will need more licenses, e.g., using the run-only licenses. They are really cheap compared to the full licensing.""I can only judge based on the situation that we had around six years ago when we did the tool evaluation. Worksoft was not the cheapest, but it provided the value. For 25 concurrent licenses, we paid more than €400,000, so it was not cheap. In the end, if you see how much time you are saving and compare it with others, its price is okay. We had also compared its cost with the licensing costs for HP and Tricentis, and they were at another level. Now, as we have already booked the licenses, we only have to pay an annual maintenance fee, which is 70%, and that is okay."

More Worksoft Certify Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the ability to automate quickly and to maintain and update scripts.
Top Answer: I haven't a bad opinion about the prices, however, when you pay a license is for a month or a year but in my experience… more »
Top Answer: We would like this to be able to be used outside of SAP applications, as it would be good for other types of products.
Top Answer: IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual.
Top Answer: RFT needs to think from a contemporary point of view — from the current context. They need to look at the way they're… more »
Top Answer: We provide this solution and others like it to our customers. We have implemented IBM Rational Functional Tester for at… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Functional Tester
Learn More
Overview
Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.

Mabl is the leading intelligent test automation platform built for Agile teams. It’s the only SaaS solution that tightly integrates automated end-to-end testing into the entire development lifecycle. With mabl creating, executing, and maintaining reliable tests has never been easier, allowing software teams to increase test coverage, speed up development and improve application quality.

Offer
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Learn more about mabl
Sample Customers
Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Edumate
Arch Insurance Group, Internet Travel Solutions, CareerBuilder, LOB, Building Engines, MaestroQA, TeamLeader, Piece of Cake
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company28%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Consumer Goods Company13%
Logistics Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government11%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm13%
Insurance Company10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise85%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise71%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while mabl is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 6.6, while mabl is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Good coverage and compatibility with excellent stability". On the other hand, IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, HCL OneTest, Micro Focus UFT One, Tricentis Tosca and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, whereas mabl is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Functionize and Micro Focus UFT One.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.