IBM Rational Functional Tester vs Micro Focus Silk Test

IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 17th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews vs Micro Focus Silk Test which is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "It has better object recognition compared to other tools in the market. It is unable to identify some objects". The top reviewer of Micro Focus Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Micro Focus UFT (QTP), Oracle Application Testing Suite and Micro Focus Quality Center. Micro Focus Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus UFT (QTP), SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus Quality Center. See our IBM Rational Functional Tester vs Micro Focus Silk Test report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Ibm rational functional tester vs. micro focus silk test report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. Micro Focus Silk Test and others in Functional Testing Tools
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational Functional Tester vs Micro Focus Silk Test

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Ibm rational functional tester vs. micro focus silk test report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. Micro Focus Silk Test and others in Functional Testing Tools
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
4,215
Comparisons
2,943
Reviews
2
Followers
658
Avg. Rating
7.5
Views
7,174
Comparisons
3,836
Reviews
4
Followers
863
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more IBM Rational Functional Tester competitors »See more Micro Focus Silk Test competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsRational Functional TesterSegue, SilkTest, Silk Test, Silk Performer
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1514653938
Micro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1516468546
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewIBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersEdumateKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
Ibm rational functional tester vs. micro focus silk test report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. Micro Focus Silk Test and others in Functional Testing Tools
Download now
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email