• Home
  • IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL]

IBM Rational Functional Tester vs Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Functional Tester and Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Hellen Zhang
Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support
The solution has provided more accurate results with database verification.
Use Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

    • More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about IBM Rational Functional Tester?
    Top Answer:Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM Rational Functional Tester?
    Top Answer:The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for IBM Rational Functional Tester?
    Top Answer:The solution is used for test automation, and test data creation.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    21st
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    1,349
    Comparisons
    781
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    225
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rational Functional Tester
    Learn More
    IBM
    Panaya
    Overview
    IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.
    Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing unties the Goardian knot between successful test cases and manual business knowledge capture, emancipating regression testing of its human factor. Autonomous Testing spans test conception through validation, addressing all aspects of the functional testing lifecycle, including discovery, execution, acceleration and test management. It helps organization reduce time, effort and risk as well as the complexity associated with business process understanding. Powered by innovative machine learning, Autonomous Testing eliminates the pains associated with creating and maintaining manually engineered scripts to enable zero touch test case creation and maintenance. The solution ensures quality teams test the right things by automatically capturing transactions production and converting them into test cases that represent domain expertise. Autonomous Testing eliminates the challenge of business knowledge transfer, ensuring testing mirrors actual user behavior.
    Sample Customers
    Edumate
    Aritzia, Allianz, Coca-Cola, Clarks, Shiseido
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise68%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 21st in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews while Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.2, while Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Katalon Studio, Selenium HQ, HCL OneTest, Tricentis Tosca and Worksoft Certify, whereas Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and Wikidi Testomato.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.