Compare IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. Ranorex Studio

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good.The most valuable feature is the UI component tester.

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pros »

Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations.This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.

More Ranorex Studio Pros »

Cons
If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility.As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support.

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Cons »

The object detection functionality needs to be improved.For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.

More Ranorex Studio Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price.

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice »

The licensing fees depend on the number of users.There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).

More Ranorex Studio Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good.
Top Answer: Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that… more »
Top Answer: If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility. There needs to be more effort made to make the solution more relevant to the application.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
22nd
Views
2,099
Comparisons
1,528
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
570
Avg. Rating
7.5
11th
Views
11,374
Comparisons
8,503
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
547
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Functional Tester
Learn
IBM
Ranorex
Overview
IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Sample Customers
EdumateSiemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Government12%
Comms Service Provider8%
Healthcare Company8%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm19%
Manufacturing Company19%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company6%
Retailer5%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Ranorex Studio is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.6, while Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Good coverage and compatibility with excellent stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, HCL OneTest, Katalon Studio and froglogic Squish, whereas Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT One and Selenium HQ. See our IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.