Compare IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. ReadyAPI

IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while ReadyAPI is ranked 18th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.0, while ReadyAPI is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Automatically adapts to changes, saving time and effort, but mobile app support is needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes "Good code coverage and quality assurance, user-friendly, and helpful dashboards". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas ReadyAPI is most compared with SoapUI Pro, Apache JMeter and Katalon Studio.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the UI component tester.

Read more »

The most valuable feature of ReadyAPI is that it is user-friendly.The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client.The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them.

Read more »

Cons
As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support.

Read more »

Performance and memory management both need to be improved because other solutions use less memory for the same amount of data.If ReadyAPI had more integration with all of the big tools on the market then this would be very useful.I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
This is a cheap solution when you consider the money that will be saved in testing.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
24th
Views
2,455
Comparisons
1,808
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
448
Avg. Rating
7.0
18th
Views
2,388
Comparisons
1,948
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
388
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 66% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Functional TesterReady API
Learn
IBM
SmartBear
Overview
IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.

ReadyAPI combines the power of SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, ServiceV, and API Monitoring in AlertSite into a single pane of glass. From functional testing, to performance testing to post-deployment monitoring, SmartBear’s API tools help you to deliver accurate, fast, and secure APIs.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Learn more about ReadyAPI
Sample Customers
EdumateHealthcare Data Solutions (HDS)
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider17%
University9%
Non Profit7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.