IBM Rational Functional Tester vs Silk Test

IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews vs Silk Test which is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "It has better object recognition compared to other tools in the market. It is unable to identify some objects". The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with UFT (QTP), Selenium HQ and Oracle Application Testing Suite. Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. See our IBM Rational Functional Tester vs Silk Test report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Ibm rational functional tester vs. silk test report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs Silk Test and others in Functional Testing Tools.
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational Functional Tester vs Silk Test

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Ibm rational functional tester vs. silk test report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs Silk Test and others in Functional Testing Tools.
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
3,941
Comparisons
2,757
Reviews
2
Followers
597
Avg. Rating
7.5
Views
6,683
Comparisons
3,634
Reviews
4
Followers
757
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more IBM Rational Functional Tester competitors »
Micro focus logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 17% of the time.
Big logo 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Silk Test competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsRational Functional TesterSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1524637054
Micro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1521912797
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewIBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
OFFER
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersEdumateKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
Ibm rational functional tester vs. silk test report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs Silk Test and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email