We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Functional Tester and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"The solution is very stable."
"The stability has always been very good."
"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"The solution can improve the startup time."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"The solution's deployment is not very easy and should be made easier."
"Over the years, I haven't identified any specific enhancements that I desire; Visual Studio has consistently met my requirements seamlessly and flawlessly."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 21st in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio, HCL OneTest, Tricentis Tosca and Worksoft Certify, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.