We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Functional Tester and ZAPTEST based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 21st in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews while ZAPTEST is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.2, while ZAPTEST is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ZAPTEST writes "The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio, HCL OneTest, Tricentis Tosca and Worksoft Certify, whereas ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, ReadyAPI, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.