We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."
"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."
"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."
"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."
"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."
IBM Rational Performance Tester is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while IBM Rational Test Workbench is ranked 15th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review. IBM Rational Performance Tester is rated 8.0, while IBM Rational Test Workbench is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Performance Tester writes "A solution that supports multiple integrations and offers great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational Test Workbench writes "Good integration with other tools, stable, scales easily". IBM Rational Performance Tester is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, Silk Test and Selenium HQ, whereas IBM Rational Test Workbench is most compared with HCL OneTest, Selenium HQ, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Appium.
See our list of .
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.