IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Plutora comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Performance Tester and Plutora based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."
  • More IBM Rational Performance Tester Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    24th
    Views
    123
    Comparisons
    91
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    23rd
    Views
    132
    Comparisons
    106
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rational Performance Tester
    Plutora Release Management, Plutora Release, Plutora Test Environment Management
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.

    Plutora Release is a SaaS solution that manages software delivery across the entire enterprise release portfolio and throughout the complete lifecycle of each release including planning, approval and execution.

    Sample Customers
    andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
    eBay, United Energy and Multinet Gas (UE & MG), Service NSW, AMP, Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC)
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government29%
    Transportation Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Construction Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Insurance Company8%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise77%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise81%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Rational Performance Tester is ranked 24th in Test Management Tools while Plutora is ranked 23rd in Test Management Tools. IBM Rational Performance Tester is rated 7.6, while Plutora is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Performance Tester writes "We can edit captured transactions and organize them by those for which we require performance metrics, but it lacks a set of manuals or guides that would take out some guess work". On the other hand, IBM Rational Performance Tester is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Tricentis NeoLoad and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, whereas Plutora is most compared with ServiceNow DevOps, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Jira Align.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.