Compare IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. PractiTest
 |
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use IBM Rational Performance Tester? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2021. 455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs. 455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,539 Comparisons 1,044 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 334 Rating 8.0 | Views 1,119 Comparisons 812 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 739 Rating 8.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 41% of the time.  Compared 38% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. Compared 4% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. |  Compared 41% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 16% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. Compared 8% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Rational Performance Tester | |
Learn | |
| IBM | PractiTest |
Overview | |
| IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity. | Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.
|
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Rational Performance Tester | Learn more about PractiTest |
Sample Customers | |
| andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon | Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company54% Comms Service Provider15% Government9% Financial Services Firm5% | Computer Software Company31% Comms Service Provider14% Manufacturing Company14% Financial Services Firm9% |
Company Size | |
Small Business19% Midsize Enterprise38% Large Enterprise44% | Small Business29% Midsize Enterprise57% Large Enterprise14% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Rational Performance Tester is ranked 15th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while PractiTest is ranked 12th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. IBM Rational Performance Tester is rated 8.0, while PractiTest is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Performance Tester writes "A solution that supports multiple integrations and offers great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". IBM Rational Performance Tester is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, Silk Test and IBM Rational Test Workbench, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Tricentis qTest, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Zephyr Enterprise and Tricentis Tosca.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.