Compare IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. PractiTest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Rational Performance Tester? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."

More IBM Rational Performance Tester Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

More PractiTest Pros »

Cons
"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."

More IBM Rational Performance Tester Cons »

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

More PractiTest Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

More PractiTest Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
Views
1,539
Comparisons
1,044
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
334
Rating
8.0
12th
Views
1,119
Comparisons
812
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
739
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Performance Tester
Learn
IBM
PractiTest
Overview
IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Performance Tester
Learn more about PractiTest
Sample Customers
andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of OregonCanonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company54%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise44%
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise57%
Large Enterprise14%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Performance Tester is ranked 15th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while PractiTest is ranked 12th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. IBM Rational Performance Tester is rated 8.0, while PractiTest is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Performance Tester writes "A solution that supports multiple integrations and offers great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". IBM Rational Performance Tester is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, Silk Test and IBM Rational Test Workbench, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Tricentis qTest, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Zephyr Enterprise and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.