Compare IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. QMetry Test Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."

More IBM Rational Performance Tester Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
523,535 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications… more »
Top Answer: There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to… more »
Top Answer: I strongly recommend this solution to others. They can use IBM Rational Performance Tester without any problems for their web applications, mobile application, or software-based applications. I would… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
16th
Views
1,378
Comparisons
948
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
434
Rating
8.0
28th
Views
110
Comparisons
63
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Performance Tester
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.

QMetry is a suite of most comprehensive test management products to provide agile testing teams innovative technology platforms to deploy better Quality Software faster with confidence. It has more than 20 integrations. QMetry brand is trusted by 400+ customers globally across many industries including Finance, Healthcare Services, Travel & Hospitality, Retail, Education and High Technology.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Performance Tester
Learn more about QMetry Test Management
Sample Customers
andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
Healthland, Stanford University, Solid Fire, Proteus, Epocrates, Cognifide, Exo, Holmes Corporation, Global Communication, University of Sydney
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government10%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise35%
Large Enterprise41%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: July 2021.
523,535 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Performance Tester is ranked 16th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews while QMetry Test Management is ranked 28th in Test Management Tools. IBM Rational Performance Tester is rated 8.0, while QMetry Test Management is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Performance Tester writes "Supports web and mobile applications, very scalable, very stable, and wonderful support". On the other hand, IBM Rational Performance Tester is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, Selenium HQ and IBM Rational Test Workbench, whereas QMetry Test Management is most compared with TestRail by Gurock and Zephyr Enterprise.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.