Compare IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Qualify UAT

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."

More IBM Rational Performance Tester Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications… more »
Top Answer: There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to… more »
Top Answer: I strongly recommend this solution to others. They can use IBM Rational Performance Tester without any problems for their web applications, mobile application, or software-based applications. I would… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
16th
Views
1,435
Comparisons
971
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
434
Rating
8.0
34th
Views
5
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Performance Tester
Learn More
Original Software
Video Not Available
Overview
IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.

Qualify UAT is a UAT management solution that is simple to use by business testers, also, easy to administer and report by managers. Our solution enables integral support not only for your key systems but all supporting applications as well.

Ensure that UAT is no longer a burden to your team, but a rewarding experience to participate in. Help them to deliver true end to end testing and multiple ways to inject ideas into the application build, whilst enjoying a global support network and cost-effectiveness!

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Performance Tester
Learn more about Qualify UAT
Sample Customers
andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
TITAN Cement Group, Edrington, Marston's Plc, Reynolds Catering, ViaSat
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise35%
Large Enterprise41%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Performance Tester is ranked 16th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews while Qualify UAT is ranked 34th in Test Management Tools. IBM Rational Performance Tester is rated 8.0, while Qualify UAT is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Performance Tester writes "Supports web and mobile applications, very scalable, very stable, and wonderful support". On the other hand, IBM Rational Performance Tester is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, IBM Rational Test Workbench and Selenium HQ, whereas Qualify UAT is most compared with .

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.