We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."
Earn 20 points
IBM Rational Performance Tester is ranked 16th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews while Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools. IBM Rational Performance Tester is rated 8.0, while Silk Central is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Performance Tester writes "Supports web and mobile applications, very scalable, very stable, and wonderful support". On the other hand, IBM Rational Performance Tester is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, Selenium HQ and IBM Rational Test Workbench, whereas Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, TestRail by Gurock and Tricentis qTest.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.