Compare IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. SpecFlow

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."

More IBM Rational Performance Tester Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
502,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications… more »
Top Answer: There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to… more »
Top Answer: I strongly recommend this solution to others. They can use IBM Rational Performance Tester without any problems for their web applications, mobile application, or software-based applications. I would… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
16th
Views
1,480
Comparisons
996
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
434
Rating
8.0
24th
Views
333
Comparisons
159
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Performance Tester
SpecFlow+
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.

SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Performance Tester
Learn more about SpecFlow
Sample Customers
andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government9%
Educational Organization5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm12%
Healthcare Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise35%
Large Enterprise41%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: May 2021.
502,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Performance Tester is ranked 16th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews while SpecFlow is ranked 24th in Test Management Tools. IBM Rational Performance Tester is rated 8.0, while SpecFlow is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Performance Tester writes "Supports web and mobile applications, very scalable, very stable, and wonderful support". On the other hand, IBM Rational Performance Tester is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, IBM Rational Test Workbench and Selenium HQ, whereas SpecFlow is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, TestRail by Gurock and Zephyr Enterprise.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.