Compare IBM Rational Policy Tester vs. Silk Central

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
32nd
Views
62
Comparisons
15
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
20th
Views
1,000
Comparisons
531
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Policy Tester
Borland Silk Central, Micro Focus Silk Central
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational Policy Tester audits websites for issues impacting compliance and effectiveness. Policy Tester drives significant cost out of the online operation by automating manual processes and identifying and prioritizing issues for immediate resolution.
Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Policy Tester
Learn more about Silk Central
Sample Customers
Ilmarinen, Brazilian Lymphoma and Leukemia Society, Government of South Australia Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, Swiss Export Risk Insurance, The Motorists Insurance Group, Nuance Communications Inc.
AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm25%
Transportation Company25%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Financial Services Firm24%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Policy Tester is ranked 32nd in Test Management Tools while Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools. IBM Rational Policy Tester is rated 0.0, while Silk Central is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Rational Policy Tester is most compared with , whereas Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, TestRail by Gurock and Tricentis qTest.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.