Compare IBM Rational Policy Tester vs. SpecFlow
Views
74
Comparisons
18
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
221
Comparisons
101
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: February 2021.
464,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared 44% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Rational Policy Tester
SpecFlow+
IBM Rational Policy Tester audits websites for issues impacting compliance and effectiveness. Policy Tester drives significant cost out of the online operation by automating manual processes and identifying and prioritizing issues for immediate resolution.
SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.
Learn more about IBM Rational Policy Tester
Learn more about SpecFlow
Ilmarinen, Brazilian Lymphoma and Leukemia Society, Government of South Australia Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, Swiss Export Risk Insurance, The Motorists Insurance Group, Nuance Communications Inc.
Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: February 2021.
464,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Rational Policy Tester is ranked 31st in Test Management Tools while SpecFlow is ranked 24th in Test Management Tools. IBM Rational Policy Tester is rated 0.0, while SpecFlow is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Rational Policy Tester is most compared with , whereas SpecFlow is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, TestRail by Gurock and Zephyr Enterprise.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.