• Home
  • IBM Rational Policy Tester vs. TestRail

IBM Rational Policy Tester vs TestRail comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM Rational Policy Tester

47 views|36 comparisons
IDERA Logo

TestRail

Read 21 TestRail reviews
3,564 views|1,637 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Policy Tester and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM Rational Policy Tester?
StuartBarker
A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities
The solution helps us with the general management of projects. It provides us with visibility on progress and quality.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."
  • "My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."
  • "Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."
  • "Negotiate the best deal you can."
  • "Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."
  • "The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."
  • "I give the price a five out of ten."
  • "The product is not much expensive."

    • More TestRail Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about TestRail by Gurock?
    Top Answer:I use the solution for test management.
    Read all 14 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?
    Top Answer:The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?
    Top Answer:TestRail should improve its pricing.
    Read all 14 answers   →
    Ranking
    32nd
    out of 35 in Test Management Tools
    Views
    47
    Comparisons
    36
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    3rd
    out of 35 in Test Management Tools
    Views
    3,564
    Comparisons
    1,637
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    309
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rational Policy Tester
    TestRail by Gurock
    Learn More
    IBM
    IDERA
    Overview
    IBM Rational Policy Tester audits websites for issues impacting compliance and effectiveness. Policy Tester drives significant cost out of the online operation by automating manual processes and identifying and prioritizing issues for immediate resolution.

    TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

    Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

    Sample Customers
    Ilmarinen, Brazilian Lymphoma and Leukemia Society, Government of South Australia Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, Swiss Export Risk Insurance, The Motorists Insurance Group, Nuance Communications Inc.
    Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company50%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
    University13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Rational Policy Tester is ranked 32nd in Test Management Tools while TestRail is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. IBM Rational Policy Tester is rated 0.0, while TestRail is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". IBM Rational Policy Tester is most compared with , whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS, Tricentis qTest, Tricentis Tosca and Sealights.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.