Compare IBM Rational Policy Tester vs. TestRail by Gurock

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."

More TestRail by Gurock Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're… more »
Top Answer: Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more.
Top Answer: I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation… more »
Ranking
32nd
Views
60
Comparisons
14
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
Views
4,539
Comparisons
3,088
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
611
Rating
7.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Policy Tester
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational Policy Tester audits websites for issues impacting compliance and effectiveness. Policy Tester drives significant cost out of the online operation by automating manual processes and identifying and prioritizing issues for immediate resolution.

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Policy Tester
Learn more about TestRail by Gurock
Sample Customers
Ilmarinen, Brazilian Lymphoma and Leukemia Society, Government of South Australia Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, Swiss Export Risk Insurance, The Motorists Insurance Group, Nuance Communications Inc.
Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company7%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise29%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Policy Tester is ranked 32nd in Test Management Tools while TestRail by Gurock is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews. IBM Rational Policy Tester is rated 0.0, while TestRail by Gurock is rated 7.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail by Gurock writes "Easy to write new test cases and test plans and it is flexible". IBM Rational Policy Tester is most compared with , whereas TestRail by Gurock is most compared with TFS, Zephyr Enterprise, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Tricentis qTest and TestLodge.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.