Compare IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Load Impact

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the RFT because it allows us to automate manual test cases.
Top Answer: Adding support for uploading a collection of test cases would be a helpful addition. As it is now, we cannot upload a set of test cases, and instead, have to create it manually. Being able to upload… more »
Top Answer: We are a consultancy and we use this solution to create a testing plan, that includes test cases, for our clients. It is part of a larger suite of tools that includes Rational Functional Tester, which… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
9th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
1,339
Comparisons
735
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
7.7
17th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
381
Comparisons
347
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Quality Manager
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.

Load Impact offers three main features:

  1. Automated testing - Integrates into your CD pipeline with CI plug-ins or opt for full control with API/SDKs.
  2. API testing - a powerful scripting environment where you can create as simple or complex API scenarios as you need.
  3. Web & web app testing - easily load test your website or web app. Record user scenarios using our Chrome extension or proxy recorder and configure a test with just a few clicks - no programming required.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about Load Impact
Sample Customers
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr
rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Manufacturing Company14%
Financial Services Firm10%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Neotys and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: May 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 9th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Load Impact is ranked 17th in Load Testing Tools. IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 7.6, while Load Impact is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Has good integration with the other professional tools but usability needs improvement ". On the other hand, IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, Tricentis qTest, TFS and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, whereas Load Impact is most compared with Apache JMeter and BlazeMeter.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.