IBM Rational Quality Manager vs ReadyAPI Performance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
135 views|70 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
SmartBear Logo
497 views|276 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Quality Manager and ReadyAPI Performance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Load Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. ReadyAPI Performance Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Reusability and integration capabilities which make it a great choice for organizations that use a variety of development tools and platforms.""It's very reliable as a solution.""The most valuable feature is the RFT because it allows us to automate manual test cases.""The one feature that has not allowed us to switch to any other solution is the integration with functional testing.""Integration with the other professional tools is a very strong advantage, so that we can have a traceability between the requirements and defects in Rational Team Concert. That's the most important aspect.""RQM's best features are integration with test automation and performance testing.""It allows user to add whichever widget (predefined) based on the need. It has integration with CCM and RM to achieve traceability.""RQM is something that we use everyday, so it has to be up and running, otherwise we would lose everything."

More IBM Rational Quality Manager Pros →

"ReadyAPI automation can help us validate the functionality of most web services, allowing us to find out the exact number of defects before deployment to the user interface.""The performance and reporting of this solution have been its most valuable features.""It's like a centralized interface that allows us to increase the quality of our APIs.""We can scale.""It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with the SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing. My team has never used it, but I know ReadyAPI provides those facilities as well.""We find the product to be scalable.""he initial deployment process is easy."

More ReadyAPI Performance Pros →

Cons
"Organizing the test cases is tedious. There is no mechanism to keep and maintain the test cases as hierarchy. This should be seriously addressed.""Adding support for uploading a collection of test cases would be a helpful addition.""Integration capabilities with other vendors' tools should improve.""While RQM allows for running tests and viewing results, it could be further enhanced in terms of performance and speed.""I think it's fine from a performance perspective but usability is something that needs improvement.""Mainly Quality Assurance and DevOps, but of course the whole company and management areas with more knowledge of quality and client success approach.""It would be helpful if we could assign a hierarchy to a group of test cases.""Currently, the user interface needs to be more user-friendly."

More IBM Rational Quality Manager Cons →

"I'd not sure if they have the same level of documentation for performance and security testing.""The solution’s interface could be improved.""This solution could be improved by offering artificial AI testing in addition to API testing. For example, we would like to have machine learning testing because when test applications, manual work could be completed automatically using this functionality.""I want the solution to be able to monitor Apache Kafka activity as well.""It is very slow sometimes.""This is an area for improvement with the tool. We unnecessarily use JMeter for some website testing, which we would like to avoid by introducing this tool for API and load testing because it provides load testing features.""We need some time to understand and configure the solution."

More ReadyAPI Performance Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licenses of these tools (the whole CLM package) is very costly as compared to other vendors' tools."
  • "Each license includes 12 months of customer support. A free 90-day trial of the software is also available."
  • More IBM Rational Quality Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution operates on a licence basis and the usage and cost varies according to the use case. It is more expensive if you include access to the learning center. On average it costs approximately 800 Euros."
  • "We find the cost to be affordable."
  • "ReadyAPI Performance’s pricing is reasonable."
  • More ReadyAPI Performance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The one feature that has not allowed us to switch to any other solution is the integration with functional testing.
    Top Answer:IBM Rational has the RFT, which is rational functional testing. We do test automation with rational functional testing. So after we do that, we can put in all the code, then I can build it, then put… more »
    Top Answer:We create test cases, and then we need to plan a new task plan feature from the existing task case file and execute the test results, which will be saved in RQM. So that is how we are using the tool… more »
    Top Answer:It's like a centralized interface that allows us to increase the quality of our APIs.
    Top Answer:The solution’s interface could be improved.
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    135
    Comparisons
    70
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    383
    Rating
    8.3
    8th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    497
    Comparisons
    276
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    600
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rational Quality Manager
    LoadUI NG Pro
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Rational Quality Manager is a next-generation web-based collaboration tool that provides test artifact management, construction, and planning throughout the entire development process. IBM Rational Quality Manager is based on IBM’s successful Jazz™ platform and derives many of its popular intuitive features from Jazz™.

    IBM Rational Manager was developed for every type of test team in the marketplace today. Every role is included, such as test manager, test architect, lab manager, tester, and test lead. The solution is also able to include various roles outside the established test organization.

    IBM Rational Quality Manager Features and Benefits:

    • Customizable design and construction: Users can easily define the overall design for each and every test case. Every test case contains a robust text editor, which can include background data concerning the test case. Test cases can include links to developmental requirements and items. They can also include test artifacts, such as test scripts, test case execution processes, and test plans. Test cases can also be integrated with test suites.

    • Intuitive reporting: IBM Rational Quality Manager provides an intuitive set of predefined reports to ensure users get comprehensive status on all projects. Additional customized reports can be made available by using the Development Intelligence or Rational Insight features for more precise reporting. Users can view live test execution status and are also able to discover the relationship between test artifacts, development artifacts, and requirements in the traceability view.

    • Exhaustive test planning processes: Users define and customize test plans that will drive all activity for the organization's teams through every component of the project’s lifecycle. Everything is developed around the concept of: “ Is this ready for release?” The test plan defines the project scope and test effort, and contains the key indicators so all team members will understand the desired outcomes.

      Top test plan tasks include (but are not limited to):

      • Definition of test and business objectives.
      • Evaluate the size of the test effort.
      • Define different environments to test and develop test configurations.
      • Develop entrance criteria, exit criteria, and overall quality goals.
      • Create a review and approval process for the test plan and/or individual test cases.
      • View Real-time Test Progress

    • Collaboration made easy: Users can easily share data with other members of the team with the Collaboration Lifecycle Management (CLM). Team members can also assign tasks and view each other's progress. They can also distribute work for review and track the input and status of each reviewer. There is also the ability to lock artifacts to prevent others from editing a completed piece.

    • Security: IBM Rational Quality Manager can protect against attack threats and data breaches with the IBM AppScan Tester. This can help achieve higher quality and more secure applications with greater positive outcomes at a very reasonable competitive cost.

    • Governance: The solution will ensure that an organization’s business processes are in compliance with department, corporate, industry, regional, and government regulations and standards. IBM Rational Quality Manager will correlate test processes and create suitable records of testing results and project history to comply with any auditing process.

    ReadyAPI Performance is an open-source load and quality assurance testing solution whose design allows organizations of all sizes to completely control their load testing process. It gives administrators the ability to customize their testing parameters and tests to best meet their needs. They can also quickly run the tests that they need to run in order to guarantee the peak performance of their application and various network components. 

    ReadyAPI Performance Benefits

    Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying ReadyAPI Performance include:

    • Run ReadyAPI Performance on the operating system of your choice. It is a system agnostic solution and can be deployed on any of the major operating systems that are currently on the market. 
    • Track events in real time. ReadyAPI Performance enables users to monitor every part of their application and network in real time. This makes it possible for administrators to spot potential issues and resolve them before they can harm their application’s performance. 
    • Test flexibility. Administrators can customize the tests that they run to best fit their particular needs. Any test that an organization needs can be designed and run by this solution without the need for integration with additional solutions. 

    ReadyAPI Performance Features

    Some of the many useful features ReadyAPI Performance has to offer include:

    • Test customization tools. Users have access to a number of tools that enable them to set the parameters of and design the tests that they run to meet their application requirements. These tools make it possible for them to tweak the tests while they are running, should that prove necessary. Administrators can drag and drop the components that they want to use to create the tests.
    • Test report generator. ReadyAPI Performance comes with a report generator that provides users with easy to understand test insights. After the tests end, this feature produces a report that shows not only the results of the test, but also an analysis that enables administrators to understand the implications of their test results. 
    • Robust load testing capabilities.  ReadyAPI Performance’s load testing tools can handle high volumes of load testing. 

    Reviews from Real Users

    ReadyAPI Performance is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. It can offer organizations many advantages. Two major advantages are the wealth of features that it makes available to users and the ease with which organizations can deploy it for use. 

    Kumar G., a software engineer at Birlasoft India Ltd., writes, “It provides many features. It facilitates load testing, operational volume testing, spike testing for the APIs, and the API is very fast It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing.”

    He also writes, “The initial setup is not very complex. For testers, they have to create their test cases and scenarios within ReadyAPI, and there they simply go for the load testing.”

    Sample Customers
    Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr
    Mercedes-Benz, Adobe, Hilton Hotels, The Home Depot
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government43%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Transportation Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government11%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. ReadyAPI Performance
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. ReadyAPI Performance and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 15th in Load Testing Tools with 11 reviews while ReadyAPI Performance is ranked 8th in Load Testing Tools with 7 reviews. IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 7.6, while ReadyAPI Performance is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Scalable and Stable solution with good integration function and support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI Performance writes "Straightforward to install with the ability to add multiple assertions but the price is too high". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center, TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise and Tricentis qTest, whereas ReadyAPI Performance is most compared with SmartBear LoadNinja and Apache JMeter. See our IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. ReadyAPI Performance report.

    See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.