Compare IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional
Use IBM Rational Quality Manager? Share your opinion.
 | Prashant Sarswat Head - Testing Centre of Excellence at NIIT Technologies Limited |
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It's very reliable as a solution."
"Integration with the other professional tools is a very strong advantage, so that we can have a traceability between the requirements and defects in Rational Team Concert. That's the most important aspect."
"The most valuable feature is the RFT because it allows us to automate manual test cases."
"LoadRunner is a very systematic tool for anyone to use. Even someone who is actually a first time user of LoadRunner can actually get a lot of benefit out of the tool."
"It provides clients with an understanding of application and system performance."
"Very useful for finding out how the system responds to load, stress, and normal situations, as well as benchmarking with other industry competitors. It also improved our response time, memory delegation, and CPU delegation. In addition, we used LoadRunner to optimize our database and website."
"The Analysis feature makes it easy to analyze cross-data and we can pin to the focus period."
"The initial setup and installation of the software were very easy and straightforward."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The load testing, reporting, and scripting features are all valuable features."
"I like the user interface. I like the way we can divide our scenarios and can tune them. The integration with the quality center is great. These features are really good."
Cons
"Currently, the user interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"I think it's fine from a performance perspective but usability is something that needs improvement."
"Adding support for uploading a collection of test cases would be a helpful addition."
"If they can make LoadRunner more comprehensive, it would really help."
"Support for Microsoft Dynamics needs improvement."
"There is room for improvement of the pilot processing, the dump analysis, and forwarding results based on the dump analysis. We have a generator, root controller, different agents, and an analyzer, so all of these are very important when it comes to LoadRunner."
"The price of this solution should be cheaper."
"Sometimes we are not be able to click on some of the buttons due to the screen mismatching and compatibility issues."
"I guess scalability becomes a problem when you use things like TruClients."
"The solution needs to reduce its pricing. Right now, it's quite expensive."
"The solution uses a lot of memory and then it dies. It's difficult to work with the solution sometimes when you run a scenario it dies. They need to make the solution lighter somehow."
Information Not Available
"I don't know the licensing cost, but I think that you would get a discount for normal usage. I think there are different yearly options for different types of usage. It is not only how many users, but also whether it is shareable or not and other criteria involved in each feature. There are additional fees for the users and hardware linked to the processing."
"The licensing fees are based on the number of users."
"It is competing with other products that may cost significantly less or may be available as open-source. Because of that it is relatively expensive."
"LoadRunner Professional is an expensive product."
"This is not a cheap product."
"There is a licensing cost that is expensive."
More Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional Pricing and Cost Advice »
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: Integration with the other professional tools is a very strong advantage, so that we can have a traceability between the requirements and defects in Rational Team Concert. That's the most important… more »
Top Answer: I think it's fine from a performance perspective but usability is something that needs improvement. It might be because of the complexity. They introduce some entities before people learn how these… more »
Top Answer: We use it to manage the testing. We have both manual and automated testing and we have many teams in DHL IT services that are designing some solutions. It's part of the whole life cycle. So they… more »
Top Answer: LoadRunner is the best load testing tool, however, it is very expensive. The factors to purchase are:
1. It can simulate load a large number of concurrent users using small HW resources (CPU memory)… more »
Views
1,412
Comparisons
817
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
7.7
Views
15,811
Comparisons
11,413
Reviews
15
Average Words per Review
492
Rating
7.8
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Rational Quality Manager
Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner
IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.
LoadRunner is the Micro Focus industry-standard software solution for application performance and load testing. LoadRunner stresses your entire system to isolate and identify potential client, network, and server bottlenecks, supporting performance testing of new technologies together with your existing, legacy applications.
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr
JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider19%
Manufacturing Company11%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm28%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider12%
Healthcare Company8%
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise69%
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise89%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 9th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is ranked 1st in Load Testing Tools with 16 reviews. IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 7.6, while Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Has good integration with the other professional tools but usability needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional writes "Good synchronization capabilities but pilot processing needs improvement". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, Tricentis qTest, Zephyr Enterprise and TFS, whereas Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter, Neotys NeoLoad and Silk Test. See our IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional report.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.