IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Neotys NeoLoad

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 4 reviews vs Neotys NeoLoad which is ranked 4th in Load Testing Tools with 9 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Global Configuration allows the user to maintain different versions of the same artifact. It does not provide inbuilt capabilities for managing the tasks related to testing". The top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "It enables my team to quickly record and modify test scripts. ". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Quality Center, SmartBear TestComplete and Visual Studio Test Professional. Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with LoadRunner, Apache JMeter and RadView WebLOAD. See our IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Neotys NeoLoad report.

IBM Rational Quality Manager

Neotys NeoLoad

18128

IBM Rational Quality Manager

Based on 4 reviews.

28979

Neotys NeoLoad

Based on 9 reviews.

Most Helpful Review

Setembrino Lusa

Engenheiro de Software - DevOps - Agile - Application Lifecycle Management Practice Specialist at a tech services company

It allows users to assign each other tasks and view the status of the assigned tasks

The software lets users register their role and create task or test-specific teams, and it allows users to assign each other tasks and view the... Read more »

SnrLoadTestEngineer234

Senior Load Test Engineer at a tech vendor

several key features: Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis.

Implementing this product has allowed us to increase the number of projects that get load testing, and the frequency by which we re-test our... Read more »

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Neotys NeoLoad and others in Load Testing Tools.

Download now

287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Neotys NeoLoad

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Reusability and integration capabilities which make it a great choice for organizations that use a variety of development tools and platforms.Latest features include versioning of testings which can be great when used for multiple releases of a product.It allows user to add whichever widget (predefined) based on the need. It has integration with CCM and RM to achieve traceability. Read more »	It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis.In my opinion, correlation of dynamic data is the most important advantage of this tool. Read more »
Cons
Mainly Quality Assurance and DevOps, but of course the whole company and management areas with more knowledge of quality and client success approach.Integration capabilities with other vendors' tools should improve.Organizing the test cases is tedious. There is no mechanism to keep and maintain the test cases as hierarchy. This should be seriously addressed. Read more »	NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications.It needs improvements in the UI. It's currently not as friendly as it should be.It would be good to make some updates on the reporting side. Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Each license includes 12 months of customer support. A free 90-day trial of the software is also available.The licenses of these tools (the whole CLM package) is very costly as compared to other vendors' tools. Read more »	The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing.Licence cost is very attractive compared to other vendor tools and also there are many license alternatives. Read more »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING	10th out of 25 In Load Testing Tools Views 2,701 Comparisons 1,552 Reviews 4 Followers 425 Avg. Rating 7.3	4th out of 25 In Load Testing Tools Views 16,413 Comparisons 4,205 Reviews 9 Followers 803 Avg. Rating 8.9
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	Quality Center vs. IBM Rational Quality Manager Compared 73% of the time. SmartBear TestComplete vs. IBM Rational Quality Manager Compared 4% of the time. Visual Studio Test Professional vs. IBM Rational Quality Manager Compared 3% of the time. See more IBM Rational Quality Manager competitors »	LoadRunner vs. Neotys NeoLoad Compared 25% of the time. Apache JMeter vs. Neotys NeoLoad Compared 25% of the time. RadView WebLOAD vs. Neotys NeoLoad Compared 7% of the time. See more Neotys NeoLoad competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As	Rational Quality Manager	NeoLoad
Website/Video
Website/Video	IBM	Neotys
Overview
Overview	IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.	The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.
OFFER
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager Learn More	Learn more about Neotys NeoLoad Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr	Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
Top Industries	No Data Available	REVIEWERS Government 25% Retailer 17% Pharma/Biotech Company 8% Non Profit 8% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Financial Services Firm 27% Pharma/Biotech Company 16% Government 13% Marketing Services Firm 6%
Company Size
Company Size	No Data Available	REVIEWERS Small Business 4% Midsize Enterprise 21% Large Enterprise 75% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business 14% Midsize Enterprise 17% Large Enterprise 69%

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Neotys NeoLoad and others in Load Testing Tools.

Download now

287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.