IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Quality Center

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews vs Quality Center which is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 25 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Global Configuration allows the user to maintain different versions of the same artifact. It does not provide inbuilt capabilities for managing the tasks related to testing". The top reviewer of Quality Center writes "Range of supported technology expands, but odd IDE design still leave newbies and pro users alike disappointed". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Quality Center, SmartBear TestComplete and Visual Studio Test Professional. Quality Center is most compared with IBM Rational Quality Manager, Tricentis Tosca and Oracle Application Testing Suite. See our IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Quality Center report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Ibm rational quality manager vs. quality center report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Quality Center and others in Test Management Tools.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Quality Center

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.I feel that the licenses are expensive. ​It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily.Sure, HP UFT is not free. But consider what you get for that cost: A stable product that is easy to use; the kitchen sink of technology stack support; decades of code (which in many cases actually is free); a version that is a stepping stone to an easier Selenium design; and a support base that is more that just the kindness of strangers.HPE has one of the most rigid, inflexible, and super expensive license models.The full ALM license lets you use the requirements tab, along with test automation and the Performance Center. You can also just buy the Quality Center edition (Manual testing only), or the Performance Center version (Performance Testing only).For pricing, I recommend to buy a bundled package. Check the HPE site for more details.

Read more »

Ibm rational quality manager vs. quality center report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Quality Center and others in Test Management Tools.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
2,477
Comparisons
1,761
Reviews
4
Followers
523
Avg. Rating
7.3
Views
10,828
Comparisons
4,485
Reviews
25
Followers
1,133
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more IBM Rational Quality Manager competitors »
Tricentislogo
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Quality Center competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsRational Quality ManagerMicro Focus Quality Center, HPE QC, HPE Quality Center
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1524637054
Micro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1527352786
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewIBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.

Test more, test faster.

Eliminate poor quality releases and reduce the cost of rewriting applications with Micro Focus Quality Center.

Quality Center helps teams build and organize the testing effort, track progress throughout the application lifecycle, and is architected around testing best practices, asset fostering re-use. Teams can quickly build or import requirements and tests, execute enhanced manual testing, schedule and manage test-automation and manage defects throughout the lifecycle.

OFFER
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about Quality Center
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersEhrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, BarrQuality Center has over 5,000 customers including The Federal Administration, Bank Asya, CitiPower, Powercor, DB Systel, JetBlue, Seagate, Swiss Life, and NNE Pharmaplan.
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Transportation Company
12%
Insurance Company
11%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
19%
Midsize Enterprise
19%
Large Enterprise
63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
9%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
80%
Ibm rational quality manager vs. quality center report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs Quality Center and others in Test Management Tools.
Download now
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email