IBM Rational Quality Manager vs SOASTA CloudTest

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 4 reviews vs SOASTA CloudTest which is ranked 8th in Load Testing Tools with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Global Configuration allows the user to maintain different versions of the same artifact. It does not provide inbuilt capabilities for managing the tasks related to testing". The top reviewer of SOASTA CloudTest writes "It is able to generate load multiple geographies and has dynamic ramp-up to many levels of virtual users. ". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Micro Focus Quality Center, Oracle Application Testing Suite and Micro Focus LoadRunner. SOASTA CloudTest is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner, Apache JMeter and BlazeMeter. See our IBM Rational Quality Manager vs SOASTA CloudTest report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
IBM Rational Quality Manager
SOASTA CloudTest
18128
19653
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Rational Quality Manager? Share your opinion.
Ibm rational quality manager vs. soasta cloudtest report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. SOASTA CloudTest and others in Load Testing Tools
252,770 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational Quality Manager vs SOASTA CloudTest

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Ibm rational quality manager vs. soasta cloudtest report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. SOASTA CloudTest and others in Load Testing Tools
252,770 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
2,831
Comparisons
2,065
Reviews
4
Followers
575
Avg. Rating
7.3
Views
6,344
Comparisons
2,715
Reviews
2
Followers
910
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more IBM Rational Quality Manager competitors »
Apache
Compared 7% of the time.
Ca2
Compared 6% of the time.
See more SOASTA CloudTest competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsRational Quality Manager
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1514653938
Akamai
  • Vendor 6816 screenshot 1514050025
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewIBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

Sample Customers
Sample CustomersEhrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, BarrChester Zoo
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company
26%
Pharma/Biotech Company
13%
Transportation Company
13%
Retailer
11%
Ibm rational quality manager vs. soasta cloudtest report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. SOASTA CloudTest and others in Load Testing Tools
Download now
252,770 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email