Compare IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. TestLodge

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the RFT because it allows us to automate manual test cases.
Top Answer: Adding support for uploading a collection of test cases would be a helpful addition. As it is now, we cannot upload a set of test cases, and instead, have to create it manually. Being able to upload… more »
Top Answer: We are a consultancy and we use this solution to create a testing plan, that includes test cases, for our clients. It is part of a larger suite of tools that includes Rational Functional Tester, which… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
14th
Views
1,308
Comparisons
714
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
7.7
22nd
Views
311
Comparisons
277
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Quality Manager
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.

TestLodge is an online test case management tool designed to be far simpler than traditional software by only providing the essentials to get the job done well. The system focuses on helping you create your test plans, input your requirements, create and manage your test suites and cases along with allowing you to easily perform multiple test runs and generate reports.

TestLodge integrates with the majority of today’s leading issue tracking tools so when a test fails in TestLodge, a ticket is automatically created saving the tester the time of creating one manually.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about TestLodge
Sample Customers
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr
Actual Analytics, Infinite Touch, Asset Management International, Usablenet, Sorenson Media, Dacuda, Harvest, RedGiant.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider18%
Manufacturing Company13%
Financial Services Firm9%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools with 3 reviews while TestLodge is ranked 22nd in Test Management Tools. IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 7.6, while TestLodge is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Has good integration with the other professional tools but usability needs improvement ". On the other hand, IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, Tricentis qTest, TFS and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, whereas TestLodge is most compared with TestRail by Gurock.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.