IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. TestRail

As of May 2019, IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 18th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews vs TestRail which is ranked 7th in Test Management Tools with 6 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "It allows users to assign each other tasks and view the status of the assigned tasks". The top reviewer of TestRail writes "Gives the tester the ability to compare calculated times to actual times it takes for a test case to run". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Quality Center, TestRail and Zephyr Enterprise. TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Hiptest and TFS. See our IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. TestRail report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. TestRail and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
340,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Reusability and integration capabilities which make it a great choice for organizations that use a variety of development tools and platforms.Latest features include versioning of testings which can be great when used for multiple releases of a product.It allows user to add whichever widget (predefined) based on the need. It has integration with CCM and RM to achieve traceability.

Read more »

Integration with Confluence and JIRA.The API to support integration of the homemade automated testing tool.Reliable and stable. It is important that TestRail be up and running 24/7 as we have users around the world using it.You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc.The ability to time test runs gives the tester the ability to compare calculated times to actual times it takes for a test case to run.Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database.

Read more »

Cons
Mainly Quality Assurance and DevOps, but of course the whole company and management areas with more knowledge of quality and client success approach.Integration capabilities with other vendors' tools should improve.Organizing the test cases is tedious. There is no mechanism to keep and maintain the test cases as hierarchy. This should be seriously addressed.

Read more »

Better prediction of text.The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry.There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum.It would be nice if they would add an export to Word.It would be nice to have a description section when creating the test scenario itself so I can indicate what the configuration should be.Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Each license includes 12 months of customer support. A free 90-day trial of the software is also available.The licenses of these tools (the whole CLM package) is very costly as compared to other vendors' tools.

Read more »

Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors.Negotiate the best deal you can.My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace.Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
340,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
Views
3,270
Comparisons
1,093
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
317
Avg. Rating
7.3
7th
Views
7,445
Comparisons
4,254
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
319
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Quality Manager
Learn
IBM
Gurock
Video Not Available
Overview
IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about TestRail
Sample Customers
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, Itaƒ BBA, BarrApple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. TestRail and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
340,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email