Compare IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Tricentis qTest

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 17th in Test Management Tools while Tricentis qTest is ranked 4th in Test Management Tools with 10 reviews. IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 0, while Tricentis qTest is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis qTest writes "Provides a central point of reference for tracking bugs and failures, who owns the issue and its status". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise and TFS, whereas Tricentis qTest is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, TFS and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Rational Quality Manager? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: February 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and the qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support.We're paying $19,000 a year right now for qTest, with 19 licenses. All the on-premise support is bundled into that.We're paying a little over $1,000 for a concurrent license.It's quite a few times more costly than other tools on the market.Our license price point is somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 a year.The price I was quoted is just under $60,000 for 30 licenses, annually, and that's with a 26.5 percent discount.For the 35 concurrent licenses, we pay something like $35,000 a year.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
17th
Views
1,608
Comparisons
974
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
4th
Views
5,373
Comparisons
3,108
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
2,048
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Quality ManagerqTest
Learn
IBM
Tricentis
Overview
IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.QASymphony is a leading provider of enterprise test case management, test analytics and exploratory testing solutions for agile development and QA teams. Our solutions help companies create better software by improving speed, efficiency and collaboration during the testing process.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about Tricentis qTest
Sample Customers
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, Itaƒ BBA, BarrAmazon, Salesforce, Barclays, Adobe, SecureWorks, Samsung, OfficeDepot, Zappos, Cisco, Visa, Verizon, FICO, Silverpop, Nordstrom
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company29%
Healthcare Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Comms Service Provider18%
Insurance Company13%
Manufacturing Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: February 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.