IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Tricentis Tosca

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 15th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews vs Tricentis Tosca which is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "It allows users to assign each other tasks and view the status of the assigned tasks". The top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Using exploratory testing, we can send an email to record manual test cases to the business analysts". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Quality Center, SmartBear TestComplete and TestRail. Tricentis Tosca is most compared with UFT (QTP), Selenium HQ and Worksoft Certify. See our IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Tricentis Tosca and others in Test Management Tools.
300,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Tricentis Tosca

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Reusability and integration capabilities which make it a great choice for organizations that use a variety of development tools and platforms.Latest features include versioning of testings which can be great when used for multiple releases of a product.It allows user to add whichever widget (predefined) based on the need. It has integration with CCM and RM to achieve traceability.

Read more »

Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people.We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis.We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation.Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications.Object Identification Wizard.Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies.Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface.The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable.

Read more »

Read more »

Cons
Mainly Quality Assurance and DevOps, but of course the whole company and management areas with more knowledge of quality and client success approach.Integration capabilities with other vendors' tools should improve.Organizing the test cases is tedious. There is no mechanism to keep and maintain the test cases as hierarchy. This should be seriously addressed.

Read more »

Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us.It needs better integration with JIRA.I would like a better user interface.Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability.The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail.Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use.Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution.Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards.

Read more »

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Each license includes 12 months of customer support. A free 90-day trial of the software is also available.The licenses of these tools (the whole CLM package) is very costly as compared to other vendors' tools.

Read more »

We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution.The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc.Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.​It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
300,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,893
Comparisons
1,322
Reviews
4
Followers
268
Avg. Rating
7.3
Views
51,770
Comparisons
13,770
Reviews
21
Followers
1,110
Avg. Rating
8.1
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
1
Followers
1
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
See more IBM Rational Quality Manager competitors »
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
See more Tricentis Tosca competitors »
Also Known As
Rational Quality Manager
Website/Video
IBM
Tricentis
Null Vendor
Overview
IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.

Tricentis Tosca specializes in enabling large enterprises to improve the quality of their applications by equipping them to optimize, manage, and automate their software testing.

Tosca's model-based approach to software test automation enables enterprises to achieve high automation rates while maximizing business risk coverage.

Tricentis Tosca also provides market-leading test case design and planning capabilities, test data provisioning, service virtualization, mobile testing, and more.

Tosca is fully compatible with other testing solutions and Application Lifecycle Management products. Tricentis also offers uniquely designed testing solutions for SAP, ServiceNow, Trax, Avaloq, and Oracle.

Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about Tricentis Tosca
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Tricentis Tosca and others in Test Management Tools.
Download now
300,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email